Robert Naselund Brain Project Transcript from Scribed.. Copy and pastable.

  In 2011 Robert Naeslund gave a lecture outlining the chronology of public acknowledgements in Newspapers and by scientists or politicians of what the New York Times at one point described as a future of “Push Button People.” The Lecture was titled “The Brain Project," which is what Naeslund referred to as the implanting of people to link their brains to a super computer. I leave here his transcription. As someone with strong interest in this topic, I find this lecture to not be very prominent in disseminated information about Monarch Program. I don't know what to make of that except to think that it is being repressed with overload of information. I hope I’m not doing that in the book I'm trying to write, but rather supporting it’s claims and organized presentation. I don't know that implantation is any longer necessary, but this is documentation of someone researching Newspapers and discussing the effort to control people by push of a button.

"From the 1940s electrodes were implanted in the brains of unwitting Hospital patients during surgery. In the 1960s mini-transmitters that easily could be implanted were developed and today "brain-chips" are also injected at hospitals internationally." -Robert Naeslund





RN "Robert Naeslund): This subject has received too little attention and that often has been related to conspiracy theories and even science fiction, but that in reality has been a state project for the past 60 years, developed behind the so called "walls of power": the secrecy of military research. My name is Robert Naeslund and I am going to give an explanation of the subject that the AMerican Senator John Glenn had his main activity during his last 3 years as a politician and that he, in his last speech in the Senate 1997, described as one of the most important questions of our times. The technology that uses remote control to directly connect to the human brain emerged as super computers were developed in the 1940s. From the beginning this technology has used implants in the human brain, then electrode two-way communication systems where the emitted frequencies could be programmed with data for influence while returning signal sent biological information that the super computer could compile and analyze.


RN: The very first articles about this technology were published in the NY Times in December 1948 when the American Professor Norbert Weiner published the book "Cybernetics" coining at the same time the "cyber" concept. It can be interesting to know where this word is coming from. The technology came to be known as bio-medical telemetry. That is the medical name for it. Telemetry means measuring at a distance. Other terms were bio-cybernetics, brain-computer-technology, or man-system-interaction, which is the Swedish State's name for this technology. The first experiments- and this is something that will challenge our understanding about medical ethics, in particular, but also doctors' functions- but there is very strong documentation about this: The first experiments with this technology in Sweden that we can document took place at Karolinska Hospital in Stockholm 1946. Electrodes were implanted in people's brains- on the same premises as today- without people's knowledge, and these people were thereafter used in medical experimentation with the new technology. Already in the 1950s'- half a century ago this extensive research program was organized behind the defense research that was at that time called F.O.A and that functioned as a "knowledge bank", innovator, made evaluations, trained doctors and professors to develop the project. Military research has by now changed its name to F.O.I and state in its annual report of 2011 that their goal is to control man's cognitive functions during the individuals whole lifetime. Cognition is about thought and reason.


Narration Quote: All facts which are presented about Sweden are as well valid for the U.S or any European nations. This techno-political violent project goes on globally and Senator John Glenn, Congressman Dennis Kucinich, The New York Times and many professors have all protested against the "rape" or menticide of the brain.





RN: It's with supercomputers that they were able to develop the "Big Brain Project" that this lecture will be about. Two years later 1953, April 3, The New York Times had an article with the Title "Scientists use electrodes in brain" and from it we can understand already at that time in 1953, one could transfer both memory thoughts and sensory functions by remote control. I'll quote a few lines from it: "Patients brains are wired for sound with hairlike electrodes in a new technique reported at the Mayo Clinic today...The scientists said that through the depth recording and electrical stimulation methods, new fields had been opened into basic function of the human brain, like memory, thought, action, sight and smell." And this article was published April 3rd 1953, but still today this is nothing that anybody talks about. Well at least not in the mass media or in the popular magazines. Professor John Lilly mentioned in his memoirs, the book with the title "The Scientist" published 1978 that in 1953- again this is mind blowing because it happened such a long time ago- 58 years ago he was called to a meeting with the director of the U.S Mental health institute that asked him to have his research with dolphins and chimps- with electrodes in their brains- to be directed behind the C.I.A's secrecy. But he refused. And the answer that he gave the General Director was also published in his memoirs telling us very much about how this technology was developed and how far the development had gone already by 1953. "Doctor Remond that uses our technology in Paris shows that this method of stimulation of the brain can be applied to the humans (with implants), without the help of a neurosurgeon. He does it at his clinic. This means anyone with the right tools can do this to a person, in secret, without any signs that electrodes have been used on the person. If this technology comes into the hands of a secret agency, they can have a total control over a person and change his beliefs extremely quickly. Thats how far this technology was developed already in 1953. The C.I.A had begun its collaboration with surgeons abroad, in this case Paris, who implanted their electrodes imperceptibly, secretly in patient's brains (hospitals, brothels, orphanages, and prisons).


Narration Quote: The magazine Science had in 1956, 30 Nov., their first extensive article regarding the brain subject under the heading "Some issues concerning the control of human behavior." Professor Carl. R. Rogers called the people under these conditions slaves of those who directed their behavior. "I believe the prediction and control of behavior may be misused...It also means the great majority are only the slaves. We can choose to use our knowledge to enslave humans in ways we never dreamed of, in such a way that they never become aware of the loss of their personalities"


RN: And this was something that was published in the magazine "Science." He also added: "in such a case we can only look back on the concept of human freedom and the right to choose, as being a historical curiosity that once existed, as a cultural accident, as a set of values in a pre-technological civilization." Yes these are indeed scary words. They state something that in fact is much more detestable than what old traditional dictatorships represent. And that the project was developed because of government decisions...well, its a horror story. That is something that Swedish Defense researcher and scientist P.M Persson talked about in an article in the F.O.A. Magazine 1965, with the title "Bio-Telemetry." He wrote: "The word telemetry comes from the Greek tele meaning far, and metri meaning measure. In Swedish telemetry would be called "measuring at a distance." Telemetry can be described as the science of the transmission of data that is normally not available. The oldest and most widely used radio system is the AM/FM system. It was standardized as early as around 1950 in the U.S.A. "The substantial portion of biotelemetry comprises data transmission. This is mainly done by using implanted transmitters. The technology has evolved very far in Swedish medical research." What in fact was developed far back in the medical research was the abuse of patients, in whose brains or heads, transmitters had been implanted. And this was something that at the time was done largely during surgeries, when patients were anesthetized. Dr. Jose Delgado, mentioned earlier in the New York Times, published in 1967 a research report, "Mans intervention in intracerebral functions." He wrote that electrodes were implanted in patients in all major hospitals around the world. I'll quote a few words from the research report: "Implanted electrodes in humans are now used in all large hospitals. The presence of electrodes in the brain is not harmful or even unpleasant and patients live a completely "normal" life in their homes. From the experimental point of view, behavioral research requires individual freedom. In consequence of this trend, we have begun to affect the brains psychological reactions and scientific studies have concluded that we can experiment with intracerebral functions responsible for developing and maintaining specific behaviors and mental functions." Well this was nothing that the patients themselves-as they were called-had the slightest idea about; that they had been implanted and that they were used in research. In experiments of their brain functions for a lifetime connected to their systems. With this technology, one of the most prioritized research areas emerged that had to do with changing people's perceptions, ideas and in general, behavior. To understand politicians' attitudes regarding this matter, I am going to report a Swedish government report from 1972. The Prime Minister Olaf Palme appointed Alva Myrdal as chairman of State Commission "Choosing the Future." The predicted future wasn't what anyone would accept. From the following words that I'm going to quote, one can better understand politician's tactical games in which human rights and all international conventions that Sweden has signed to protect citizens, were completely mashed. Alva Myrdal wrote: "Research in the field of brain function and behavior is primarily aimed at identifying the nature and extent of those changes that can be achieved with different methods. Discussion about the various methods to influence people, are leading to the question of the individual's ability to protect oneself from undesirable influences and the invasion of privacy. Undoubtedly, the protection of the individual against the abuse of these and similar methods in today's society are inadequate." IN fact the government did not want to give us-the people- protection against the technological intrusion into our brains.




RN: This was 40 years ago. They gave their sympathies to power instead of taking the people's side and felt solidarity with some small but powerful groups such as the military, the professors and the researchers. In particular, these three groups. All of them wanted to develop it against humanity....and the whole population. About the same time the American Professor of Astronomy, Carl Sagan, published his book "The Dragons of Eden." In that book he discussed this technology, and he wrote that people who accept electrodes in their brains have lost any chance of freedom. I quote from it "When it comes to technological nightmares, it is important to recognize the possibility that people can understand it and prevent government abuse. The people. that allow the government to implant electrodes in their brains, have lost the battle of freedom." A way of understanding it- at least the beginning of the lost freedom- is to realize that not a single article has come out in mass media that has been able to create a debate about this technology and its emerging role as a political factor.


RN: But there has been one newspaper, a single newspaper in the world, that has been better than any other. It has challenged the greatest power on earth in this matter, and it is The New York Times. Already from the start in the 1950s, they bought up the research reports that referred to the possibility to, for the first time in human history-being able to neutralize- not only mental diseases but even physical ones. They have written many articles about this development in the 1950s. In the 1960s; they began saying that the technology was being misused. And they also published many leading figures' warnings about the social danger of a society under brain (mind) control. During the 1970s the danger had become even greater and more and more articles were written about the C.I.A's brain control systems. During a single summer in 1977 the New York Times published thirty articles about the C.I.A's brain control systems. The most important thing that was brought into the light was that this project had already had begun in the 1940s, and that they had built with this technology, a state within a state. In 1967 the New York Times had its first editorial under the title "Push Button People" and they discussed ongoing experiments that warned about the development of this technology and it was stated that it has come up to a more general debate and to everyone's attention. They also mentioned that probably there were countries in the world that already planned to subjugate their populations using this technique. I'll quote a few words from the New York Times editorial. "It is the possibility of similar control over human beings that causes concern. Several years ago a scientist told a scientific meeting that experiments with patients seems to support the distasteful conclusion that motion, emotion and behavior can be directed by electrical forces and that humans can be controlled like robots by push buttons. It is indeed a distasteful conclusion but it is quite conceivable that in some countries investigations may be under way into the possibility of using these techniques to control human beings. But the mere existence of such a possibility is disturbing, and certainly merits wider public discussion and a greater attention than it has received up to now." Certainly this was the way it was. Both in the U.S. and Sweden were countries that had far reaching plans to subjugate citizens beyond their knowledge in brain control systems.


RN: BY this time, surgeons had under two decades committed their abuses on patients and this technology has during the whole time been developed behind the Swedish defense Research Institute F.O. A. The Experiments have during the whole development been very brutal. A conference was held in 1986, March 13th, about this issue, at The Swedish Department of Justice. Swedish Justice Minister, Sten Wickborn, had invited some professors, researchers and a few politicians. At the meeting it was mentioned that this musn't reach the mass media. One professor, Bengt Pernow said that researcher from all over the world are coming to Sweden, to experiment on humans, as they don't have the right to do that in their own countries. Because we here in Sweden have less protection for our human rights than other nations and this was mentioned in clear words at that conference. We tend to believe that we in Sweden live in the best of all democracies. Thats jhow it usually sounds in the mass media anyway, but if you only scratch a little bit on the surface you discover something very different. To return to the New York Times, they publish their second editorial September 19th, 1970, under the title "brainwave." It indicated that Orwell's vision of the future had already expired. Something new was around the corner, something new and much worse. Every newborn baby, it's first experience in this world would be to be implanted with a neurotransmitter and for their entire lifetime have emotion and cognition controlled by state computers.


Narration Quote; NEW YORK TIMES editorial excerpt Aug 5 1977, "Control C.I .A not behavior; " So we must add repugnant medical experimentation to the list of horror stories emerging from the C.I.A. It was no secret that the agency once hunted desperately for means to control human behavior. One objective was to program individuals so that they might do the agency's bidding even to the point of ignoring such fundamental laws of nature as self-preservation. We are not sufficiently schooled in ethics to know how this differs from murder. There is no substitute for also holding their senior officials ethically and legally responsible as individuals for all activities. Even at this late date. the country should be told who sanctioned such projects, and how.


RN: These are good words coming from The New York Times. Now, 35 years later, we have every reason to make the same demands in Sweden. What happened during 60 years of brain experimentation? Which doctors, professors, what institutions have been involved in the most anti democratic project that ever existed? By what kinds of methods has it been possible to keep off the media and peoples attention? What defenses have been set up? What is the role of medical corporations? They are involved. What does the government say? F.O.I's supercomputers must be turned off! We are all about to become the state's lab rats and chip manipulated behavior skulls, and that is verified by F.O.I itself.


RN: To give you an idea about the Pentagon's usa of brain control technology I will quote something which, just as everything else no one has heard of even though it should have been on the front pages of the mass media. A few people with insight and courage dared to reveal the most secret, the military's use f brain technology for mass murder. Two British Scientists, Professor Malcolm Varner and Dr. Michael Stone, published in 1970 the book "The Data Bank Society," a strong protest against the government's power over people's minds. At that time the U.S had its war in Vietnam, and they had advanced methods for implanting people by mixing up microchips in both medicine and alcohal; one could within a few years scan a large part of South Vietnam upper and middle class. The super computers (via Radio Tower and Scanners) could thereafter analyze and evaluate people generally deduce their opinions and see what they were up to. They rationalized (via the data) that there weree 33,000 "very important people" that were vietcong sympathizers which they planned to execute, and it could be done by the same ingested technology through which their sympathies were assessed through the cennection to their brainwaves- their biological "feelings" could be altered to a state that was lethal rendering them sick or diseased. By intromitting heart attacks, strokes, cancer or whatever they liked. The following brief quotation from Professor Malcolm Varner says alot about that: "Hopelessly thwarted in its attempts to improve information input, the U.S Command in Saigon has developed its most skilled reseources to rendering its information processing ultra-sophisticated. It has invented what is in effect, a computerized "extermination machine"... The high command in Saigon is now extending the idea of computer selections to individuals as well as selected areas. This year, 1970, the program aims to "eliminate" 33,000 inividual Vietnamese civilians who- it has been determined by the computer- are Vietcong Sympathizers. This quote says alot about being able to- through the computer brain interaction- manipulate someone's biological functions even to the point where they die for one reason or another that can't be differentiated from natural causes. The same resources are also in the F.O.I's computer systems and it is also used to to keep the brain systems away from the mass media and people's knowledge. A Swedish general Director, Stina Whalstrom, wrote in 1989 in the data inspections annual book that as long as this continues, Sweden cannot be called a Democracy. She wrote about people exploited without their knowledge or against their will. Of course these are harsh words that we are not living in a democracy, but a project like this cannot exist in a democracy. However one of the best protests and revelations from this society's own authroities was actually stated a few years ago. March 16 2005, The European Commission's Ethical Council with the Swedish Professor Goran Hermeren as chairman published the document "Ethical Aspects of I.C.T implants in the human body" to the E.U Commission as a reccomendation on how one should regard this technology's future development. It is without doubt challenging the system and it is the best of all other explanations and the biggest disclusre made about this technology. Their 30 page document explains that implants are injected into people for research and social control purposes. I.C.T stands for Information Control Technology and includes everything from electrodes to biochip implants. The quotes from their document say everything regarding how this technology is nowadays used not only in Sweden, but in all Europe, within the European Union. They are talking about injecting people, unwittingly with chips. Well, this has in fact been going on for 60 years now, but good they mention it. I quote from their document: "Brain Computer -interface or direct brain control: the technologies involved above are communication technologies: they take information from the brain and externalize it. There are internalizing technologies whose purpose is to take information from outside and provide individual access to it." They did not talk about any particular individuals but about all of us...it was declared that it to a transformation of human being.


Here is the quote: "Our present society is confronted with the changes that have to do with the anthropological essence of what man's inner nature is." They did not mention some specific people or population groups, but in fact all of us.This is a planned population project for the manipulation of our inner most nature. Our right to think for ourselves. They explain that it was a threat to democratic society and of course it is so. Not even a Hitler with his old methods could be a more terrifying threat in today's societies when you compare them with the technology's intrusion into our brains. They wrote "E.G.E makes the evaluation that non-medical applications of implants are a potential threat to human dignity and the democratic society... the use of the remote control to take over people's will must be absolutely prohibited." It is of course not less critical to go into someone's brain and change a human beings thoughts and will- than it was under Hitler and Stalin's times- forcing people behind barbded wire in order to neutralize their thoughts and will power. It says alot about our political governance of course. In addition, you should be aware that many of those who sit in Paliament also have their brains incorporated into the defense department's super computer control systems. Of course they become a type of puppet for the will of others.





Narration Quote: Frequency Errata Table of Implanted Americans by Professor Stuart Mackay, "Telemetry is Coming of Age" 1983. Biomedical frequency allocation in the United States for research and patient monitoring: Frequency mils; 38-41/88-108/174-216 Bandwidth Life: 200/200/200, Field Strength 10 at 15m/ 50 at 15m/150 at 30m. Out of band transmitter requirements (maximum); 10 uvm at 3m/40 uvm at 3m/15 uvm at 30m





RN: Next quote is about health and our social life that has largely that has largely degenerated since the brain technology had its impact from a couple of decades ago. A neuro Professor, Anders Lasner at Stockholm Brain Institute states that approximately 30% of people in the E.U. suffer from brain diseases or behavioral disorders. It increases and it is directly related to this technology. We all have of course been confronted with the tragedy that people seem to become stranger and stranger. The E.U. ethical group provided us with an explanation of the reasons: "It should be stressed that there are no reliable scientific investigations concerning the longterm health aspect of implants in the human body. The unretricted freedom of some may endanger the health and safety for others. As in other areas, the freedom to use implants in one's own body i.e the principle of freedom itself might collide with the potential negative social effects."


Narrator Quote: The European Commissions Ethical Board wrote: "Brain computer interface (B.C.I) or direct brain control are communication technologies; they take information from the brain and externalize it...Contemporary society is confronted with changes that have to do with the anthropological essence of individuals...to what extent might this technology be misused by the militairy?...the member states and their ethics councils have a responsibility to create conditions for education and constructive, well informed debates in this area.


RN: Under the section "Human Dignity Integrity and Autonomy" The E.G.E group brought up a number of questions not because they wondered about the answers, but probably because they were best presented as questions; "How far can such implants be a threat to human autonomy, particularly when they are implanted in our brains?" "How far can such implants have irreversible impact in the human body and or the human psyche?" "How will they influenc human memory?" "Does a human being cease to be such a being in cases where parts of his or her body- particularly the brain- are subsituted and/or supplemented with I.CT. implants?" "How far can I.C.T implants give an individual, or a group, specific capabilities that could become a threat to society?" "How far should we be subject to the control of such devices or by other people using these devices?"


From this quote when the E.U. Commission's Ethical Board talks about these implants in our own brains and bodies, we can understand the extensive use of this project. It has, in fact, throughout the history of mankind never existed anything more totalitarian. There has never been anything more anti-democratic. A dictator ship can never be greater than when citizens' brains are linked to computer control.. The state has become a cannibal, a rapist who is eating its citizens. Transforming us into biological manipulated components. But the E.U commission did not support their reccommnedation on the need to stop the ongoing trend of mind control. They instead accepted the constitution of this project and of course, that day when this techno-political development will create debates in the mass media, it will have serious consequences. They ended the document by urging that this development must become general knowledge. Quote: The member states and their national ethics councils have a responsiblily to create conditions for education and constructive, well informed debates in this area" Of coursde it is good if everyone joins this challenge. But these councils have now had more than 6 years to show their inability. No debate has arisen. Not even a single word has been said yet. But this is of coure everyone's responsibility All of us must partiipate to ensure this issue reaches the mass media. This is one of humanities crossroads. One can almost say that nothing has ever happened in the history of mankind. That this is the very first time something is occuring. In other words before this we have always been our own biological creations. Sure, we have been indoctrinated to believe or not in certain things, but we have nevertheless always had our own biology, mentality, our own resources intact. This is an issue, almost completely unknown, but without doubt humanity's most important. ANd that is exactly what Senator John Glenn said in his speech in 1997 when he left the Senate.


Narrator Quote: The Swedish Defense 7 Research Institution wrote in its annual report 2011; F.O.I developed systems with emphasis on the interaction between people and technology. The goal is that sysetmes are designed at the human cognitive potential i.e. the ability to perceive, understand, and sorting information can be utilized for maximum system effect...


RN: Everyone must of course join this cause! The media has of course a responisbility to address this issue. Of course all human rights organizations Greenpeace, Attack, Amnesty and of course all political parties that see people's well being as above state power must participate in order to bring this subject up for a debate, and by that making change possible. I will end these dark visions with some positive thoughts about this technology. The man that termed the pharase "information society," The Japanese Professor Yoneji Masuda published his book "The Information Society" in 1980. In that book he brought up the dark and the light applications of this technology an he wrote: "If information systems were to be completely dominated by a despotic state organization, the information society would be the ultimate controlled society, in which the abuses would far exceed the abuses of human rights under dicatorships, but if the people took over the systems we could live free, healthy active, creative lives of up to an average of 90 or more. This technology has as many positive as negative applications. Thank You.







Sweden Human Brain Project Conference Transcript | PDF | Brain |