Chapter 6: Part 1 Political thoughts or Speech, which I have had or do have that may have gotten me Targeted:

Don't know how to divide the final first section of this last pages. i may do a part 1 and 2 with the blog entry 3rd and last chapter

The Following is Political Speech which I have had or do have that may have gotten me Targeted:

 

Human rights victims, Targeted Individuals, often times are unsure of why they have been targeted. I've discussed earlier how the FBI engages in political surveillance. Additionally, some targets could be targeted for being whistleblowers or because they belong or are perceived to belong to groups that are targeted by the state and its minions.  In some cases, it could be because the target has done something to challenge established criminals or elite in society who don't want something immoral or unethical to be challenged. In my case, I believe it is related to political speech or to political thought. I believe I have had my mind read for decades along with the general population.

 

 5 Small possible political speech or thoughts that caused my targeting: 

• At a younger age I would often get lost in thought about hidden motives of people controlling political systems or hidden structures and organizations. I theorized that there are fraternities who surround monarchs and control them until they kill them throughout history. I then got surrounded and controlled for political reasons, so the theory, whether correct or not drew interest from the government, perhaps even from monarchs.

•  Around time of the Arab Spring, I made a collage that depicted the earth enveloped in the Roman Coliseum with the wars being conducted like Gladiator spectacles for consumption and with a cult hierarchy that supersedes heads of government but includes them. And I depicted an unarmed Iraqi who was snipered in one of the pictures with people watching it all like a Roman audience screaming for blood lust. 

• In recent years Beto O’Rourke stated a major reason to endorse Biden was to fight for democracy around world. In College, I wrote a paper about how in the enlightenment there was an element of evangelism. That’s why we kill people for a cause in the West. Why people do it in other civilizations I'm not privy to other than justice and revenge though I'm sure cause is an issue.

• When I was in College in a Journalism class, I wrote an essay or article about a major cultural problem in society, which was the way society builds up and tears down celebrities in almost ritual fashion and acts like they have ownership of them. I got a C and the professor said it wasn't a significant or major problem in society. Exposure of Mind control operations would present an additional predicament for this grade.

• In The Ancient Aliens Epsiode titled Beyond Roswell, guest experts asserted that The Cold War was a ruse or a smokescreen of some kind to excuse the development and work in tandem regarding UFO reverse engineering. I had this thought before, independent of this show, some decade ago or more and I've expressed in this book some notion of that regarding the wars in Ukraine and Iraq. But I don't know. I definitely think there is an order inherent in wars heaped upon people and find it highly suspicious that Russia and the United States largely ruled over the earth in the 20th century fighting wars in other people's countries. So, if we called UFOs actually spaceships coming in and out of the atmosphere with technology and at speeds beyond public disclosure, then there’s some space faring colonization well beyond what Elon musk intends to do publicly with SpaceX. There was a CIA agent in the 70s or 80s who theorized that UFOs were time traveling entities. Perhaps that is the case, but with an apparent high technology at play one wonders where do the people operating these get their money? With an apparent disclosure that there was going to be some massive Psyop in Ukraine with fake corpses, explosions, victims and mourners, I ask is it possible to conduct a massive series of these incidents? Also is it possible to have a war where the cabal or leaders of countries don't strike to eliminate each other but target selected military and civilian personnel in each other's organizations, while hiding funds for what people call a "breakaway civilization?" A real war could also serve to that end as well. The war could possibly showcase lower tech and contribute to the illusion held before the audience, with the citizens of countries who are not in the know of what takes place with blackops etc. So are they planning on letting us wither away on earth killing it as wage slaves competing against each other and bombing each other to death over water land and oil?

 

The rest of this Book is additional thoughts I've had that possibly was a reason for being targeted:

 

In 2010, around the time I began being threatened and overtly harassed in public, I was connecting dots of global erasure of events by other news stories, knocking unflattering events for the elite out of the news cycle. One story I found funny was the African dictator Charles Taylor’s trial. The law suit over the "Ground Zero Mosque" by The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) happened simultaneous to the Naomi Campbell testimony in the Charles Taylor case. If you don't recall, plans to build a 100 million dollar Mosque near or at Ground Zero became public and was sensationalized by political leaders and the media. In the Charles Taylor case, during cross examination by a former Air Force Colonel, Taylor had months previously identified ACLJ founder, Pat Robertson, as "his man in Washington." And wouldn’t you know that it was Pat Robertson’s organization which stoked the Ground Zero Mosque controversy in the news which dwarfed Taylor’s revelation. Taylor revealed that he granted Robertson permission to mine gold in Liberia, as reported by ABC News:  

 

“Prosecutors at the human rights trial of former Liberian warlord Charles Taylor alleged Thursday that Christian televangelist Pat Robertson had lobbied the White House on Taylor's behalf in return for a gold mining contract.

 The controversial pastor and former Republican presidential contender met with then-President George W. Bush on Taylor's behalf, prosecutors charged during cross-examination of Taylor in a Dutch courtroom, allegedly in return for a contract to mine gold in southeast Liberia -- a contract they say that Taylor had no legal right to grant. “ (60)

I opined at the time that following mining money would be a rather interesting ordeal. One place following mining money would lead would be to the very weapon systems used to kill and torture targeted individual human rights victims as well as to the major weapons industry that kills all over the world. Much of the high tech weaponry used by industrialized and developed nations is made up of minerals mined all over the world. Looking into mining is looking into the production process in the military industrial complex. I guess, in the seventies, if we would have become anti fossil fuel, then Africa would have seen more war for the renewable minerals. I don't know if the middle east would be poorer or not, but the air quality and climate would be less impacted.

 In testimony before Congress, Wayne Madsen revealed that America ran the Congo War through proxy or through what I think is an essentially African Legion with leadership trained in the United States. This testimony took place months ahead of the Twin Towers attacks on 9/11 and the subsequent War on Terror completely overshadowed the American War in Congo, which was started by illegal invasions years earlier. Months after Wayne Madsen's testimony on the American War in Congo, which included illegal invasions and war crimes violations, Henry Kissinger wrote an article attacking Universal Jurisdiction. (61) Human Rights Watch describes Universal Jurisdiction as 

"the ability of the domestic judicial systems of a state to investigate and prosecute certain crimes, even if they were not committed on its territory, by one of its nationals, or against one of its nationals (i.e. a crime beyond other bases of jurisdiction, such as territoriality or active" (62)

The American Journalist Wayne Madsen had just testified that U.S personnel were implicated in war crimes in the biggest war since World War II in Africa, an implication which would see responsibility in the hands of high ranking U.S officials. Kissinger would shortly be appointed head of the 9/11 commission. His anti Universal Jurisdiction piece ran one month prior to the Twin Towers destruction. The United States, in its war on terror, would go on to terrorize people all around the world and pull out of the Geneva Conventions, an international treaty 'obliging state parties to use Universal Jurisdiction.' It also basically dismembered international law as part of it's war on terror to the point where one wonders if it wasn't a war against International law.   

I had previously been interested in how war in The Democratic Republic of Congo, a war for minerals to supply high tech weapons, which Wayne Madsen testified in Congress that American special forces initiated, resulted in the biggest war anywhere in the world since WWII and that this testimony came mere months before September 11th. So as the country was digesting new forthcoming information about how The United States was instrumental in this bloodshed in Africa, a war for minerals essential to its weaponry, it was soon redirected people to pay attention to terrorists who allegedly took down the World Trade Center and flew airplanes into the Pentagon, creating a new "just war" in the middle east. In the years since this event, the day's event, and details which surround it, have spawned a huge 9/11 Truth movement coinciding with a huge War on Terror sprawled about everyone's television screens and newspapers bringing sensationalist shock after shock.

 

Congo is estimated to have 24 trillion dollars worth of untapped 'resources.' (63) This is more than the combined GDP of Europe and the United States. In 1996, the Democratic Party invaded Congo with basically an African legion of the United States. Not only did the Democratic Party leaders in the Clinton Administration invade and kill millions of people, they also pillaged and personally profited off corrupt mining contracts while promoting an economy that is completely dependent upon their exploitation and dominance of the central African region. This behavior is identical, and in many ways even worse than the invasion of Iraq, which the Democratic Party promoted and actively participated in for decades prior to the most recent 2nd invasion. Conveniently, the shock and trauma of warfare in Iraq, obscures a possibly even more strategically significant and bigger crime in Congo or central Africa.

 I attended a protest with a sign that read "There'd be No bombing in Middle East without the bloodshed in Africa" or something along those lines.

Another potential reason for my targeting is that previous to the Haitian Earthquake of 2010 and after, I became interested in the Haitian Revolution (of 1804). In her book about the Haitian revolution, Modernity Disavowed, Professor and author Sibylle Fischer discusses the silencing of events or the replacing of one event with other events and deliberate attempts by the subordinator class or intellectual elites to mold nations, to mold the psyche of the masses. (64) Recently, in January of 2023, in an interview with Anderson Cooper, Prince Harry revealed a way of operation amongst the Royal Family of The United Kingdom. When a family member or members want to receive good press in the media, they will plant bad press for another member or somebody else as a way to receive positive spin cycle or pr campaign. This revelation by Prince Harry touches upon this basic principle that Fischer points out. That the creation or publicizing of events can mold the psyche of the masses and replace events or silence other events. 

 From 1996 - 2003 5.4 million people died in Congo. This invasion and warfare has killed, in some estimates, 10 million people. (65)  I believe this cover-up is a crime bigger than The War on Terror and the staging of 9/11, though those are huge events. As stated, the Democratic Party was and is heavily involved, but they would have people believe that they are just an incompetent party and that the two events, The War on Terror/9-11 and war in central Africa and Congo are unrelated. I started a blog and defined war as an ideological construction to compel participation and induce obedience in the maintenance and accumulation of power through murder and questioned The War on Terror as a staged propaganda event to manage political reality and to distract from the totality of warring operations in the American Empire. I attempted to point out how through deliberate crafted discourse, there is collusion of the imperial parties of America, Republican and Democrat in doing so. To be clear, war is for the purpose of propaganda. It is a cultural production. Additionally, I questioned it as a function to create chaos and terror in particular places, being deliberate punishment of nations as a demonstration of power. 

The current ongoing event or cascade of events accomplishing this task for imperial parties is the War in Ukraine and the Trump Presidency or now a potential rerun for president. The Trump presidency functioned, so as to erase past crimes or other activities by past presidents. The drumbeat surrounding his presidency was one of begging for the Bush or Obama years. Even I fall for this trap from time to time thinking that while it was bad that Obama was so worshipped you couldn't criticize him, at least he was respected and the office of president was respected to the point one could imagine changing reality through democracy. Trump trashed that whole notion. Yet still we have to see that the whole country seems to have collective amnesia and cannot remember the crimes and misdeeds of previous presidential administrations nor ongoing crimes started by them. For instance, many professional sports teams found the courage to challenge presidential prestige and maybe rightfully so in the face of Trump's tactics. Numerous championship teams denied invitations to the White House to celebrate with President Trump. The stand is largely seen as righteous. Yet this stand against Trump has me wonder when a Democrat murders millions or thousands of people, will teams forgo going to the White House for their championships for those atrocities? If not, what is the purpose of forgoing Trump, if not to lend normalcy and endorsement of those atrocities or future ones by a different party or administration? If someone in your family became a terrorist or was deemed a terrorist, Donald Trump says he would kill you. I personally think Trump says things to make other people look moderate. In this case, it should be noted that the United States has been acting out his proposition. Previous to the Trump Presidency, Muammar Ghadaffi, former head of the state of Libya, had a toddler killed in an air strike, seemingly a message to leaders around the world that their families were fair game. 

The United States is responsible for nearly 15 million deaths between Iraq Afghanistan and Congo since 1990. (66) The Bushes' poll numbers indicate tiny political accountability for their part, but the Clintons seem to be unscathed by the Congo and, for that matter, Iraq because there's not U.S deaths for their operations. Hillary Clinton won the Democratic party with little to no mention of the Iraq sanctions, bombings, war and war in The Congo and even won the popular vote in the General Election. 

Perhaps the most significant time of the most recent administration previous to Trump, the Obama Administration, was the time during the Egyptian Revolution to the Libyan and Syrian wars. This time was coined as all part of the Arab Spring. There has been much talk about how the Arab Spring was utilized to justify American Intervention in Libya and Syria. One thing that struck me during those days of revolution and then war was the stark contrast in imagery from the subsequent events, revolution then war. During the revolution there was imagery of regular people engaging in intellectual discussion and largely peacefully assembling. During these days it was interesting that women were present. I found that tropes about the middle east were being upended at least for a few days. This soon was replaced with imagery of violence, racism and bloodshed once weapons started pouring into Libya. In these images, the violent male dominated the day.  The question I had about these images was whether or not they were controlled or deliberate. As any Targeted Individual will tell you, the psychological operations connected to what is some continuance of the MK Ultra program attempt to control the psyche of the masses, just like Sybille Fischer spells out in her book about the Hatian Revolution. In fact I found the common theme presented far and wide from military officials and other intellectuals describing the revolution then ensuing war along the lines of "developing" middle east to be suspicious. To me, it was as if the cultural production of the war was being presented as a contrast between the elite warriors of the Pentagon by officials, often white, in medal award lined coats and uniforms positioning themselves as further evolved technologically, refined and just generally advanced than the warriors they directed in the Middle East. Many of these officials would appear in peaceful comedy studios like Stephen Colbert show or Jon Stewart show and crack jokes about chaos of those violent warrior developers in the middle east comparing them to the United States development in the 1700s, 200 years earlier. 

Walter Lippman, who is considered the Father of Modern Journalism, coined the phrase stereotype. Lippman's stereotype, the "picture in our heads," a weapon of mass communication in social conflict and management, provides pillars of unexamined certainties (67) in the onslaught of atrocity justification and wars heaped upon the public, conducted in terrain of lessened repellence. The imagery coming through during the Egyptian Revolution was a breath of fresh air for much of the American population. An autocratic dictator was being challenged by democratic activists. This imagery was seemingly used to sell a war which thwarted many of the masses' desired elements of the revolution.

Shortly after the first days of the Egyptian revolution, James Baker and Henry Kissinger talked in opeds of pragmatic idealism, a concept of French philosophy during Napoleon era of re-domination of Haiti, and the New York Times editorial board broadcasted calls for President Obama to use A10 aircraft which are known to be vehicles for the usage of Depleted Uranium. (68)  Pictures distributed by the Telegraph in which Arab men held captive black migrants accused of being mercenaries became the hallmark mental producing image of the 'war' declared in the midst of a revolution in Egypt filled with factory strikes. (69) 

I'll briefly pause here and say that I found the soldiers in this photo to resemble models, almost, and that I found how clean they were in a war zone to be weird in my mind. I share this to harken back on the images and articles I shared earlier about the Iraqis staging a car bomb and faking victims. In any event The Libyan war had replaced the Egyptian Revolution. And now today people are downright skeptical of disobedience to autocratic dictators in the middle east, where a heavy handed imperialism rules with divide and conquer. I found it interesting that the imagery from the Arab Spring transformed to one of factory strikes by wage slaves living under dictatorship to that of Arab masters trading African migrants as slaves.

According to a source quoted in the Wall Street Journal, the Administration, at the very least, "knew of" weapons being shipped by The Egyptian Military across the border into Lybia "a few days" before March 17th No Fly Zone declaration. (70) I saw that the historical pattern of behavior by elite imperialists from Napolean to Baker and Kissinger was apparent in the modern decrees by the new brand ambassador of the War on Terror, President Barack Obama. To quote from Marinetti's 1909 Futurist Manifesto

 

...Beauty exists only in struggle. There is no masterpiece that has not an aggressive character. Poetry must be a violent assault on the forces of the unknown, to force them to bow before man. We are on the extreme promontory of the centuries! What is the use of looking behind at the moment when we must open the mysterious shutters of the impossible? Time and Space died yesterday. We are already living in the absolute, since we have already created eternal, omnipresent speed. We want to glorify war — the only cure for the world — militarism, patriotism... (71)

 Apparently, I was correct about noticing a pattern of behavior in imperialist elites because the push for war through no fly zones as well as Kissinger-esque tactics around the world including Operation Phoenix, which Marshal Thomas describes as the model for the Targeted Individual program, were championed a few years later for more war in Syria by former State Department and Defense Department official, Robert Caruso who wrote in the Huffington Post that

Henry Kissinger’s strategies in Laos and Chile are also a model of success that should be emulated, not criticized. Critical to advancing American foreign policy will be an acceptance that reinventing the wheel should give way to duplicating past successes of Operations PHOENIX, NOBLE ANVIL, AMBER FOX, CELESTIAL BALANCE, and JUNIPER SHIELD.

The proven synergy of special operations forces working in concert with the interagency, particularly but not exclusively the intelligence community, should be built upon significantly. (72)

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fortune-favors-the-bold_b_12200132

 Caruso also prefaced his push for Operation Phoenix with the sober assessment that "our security commitments require sustained involvement abroad for centuries." So, the fact that a state department and defense department official admits that imperial tactics are emulated or that they repeat themselves through contemporary times and for centuries at a time, has me wonder if the thought that there isn’t some ancient playbook being passed down to pacify the masses isn't correct. This is a pondering shared by many I’m sure.

 

Obama and General Friedrich Van Bernardh set to Win the Future through world war?

 

This idea of an ancient playbook presented itself in a pattern seen President Obama's 2011 state of the union address in which like all U.S presidents he pitted the U.S against the world as a competitor. But what struck me additionally was how he was using the phrase "Win The Future." 

An innocuous phrase you might say until you realize that 100 years earlier, European Generals called for “winning glorious futures”, using those exact words, conducted racist propaganda campaigns for imperial incursions, continued to murder 10s of millions, created free trade charters, while directly ruling and indirectly ruling people in lands that would become today's Nations. Above is a propaganda picture from 1911 when Italy dropped the first bomb ever by hand on top of other people's heads in Tripoli during a 1911 bombing campaign. The campaign came at an immediate and long term cost to those it was waged on, and additionally to the poor in the South of Italy as well. The products used for Imperial campaigns of the past, even those of the decade prior were rendered obsolete and in a matter of decades the flesh of tens of millions more would be rendered obsolete through the world wars and the rest of the 20th century. 

 The revolution in Egypt and subsequent war in Libya hit following President Obama’s Imperial gauntlet, laid down during The 2011 State of The Union. In it, he declared unspecified but ever-existing worldwide threats, a new binary opponent in the people of China, provided fresh legs for atrocity justification and channeling either through internal sabotage or straight out lunacy, the German General Friedrich Van Bernardhi circa 1911 who after discussing Germany’s colonial problem in Morroco, prefaced his assertions that war was biologically necessary stating:

 

Our Science, our literature, and warlike achievements of our past have made me proudly conscious of belonging to a great civilized nation which in spite of all weakness of bygone days, must, and assuredly will, win a glorious future. (73)

Additionally, President Obama's assertion of winning the future came just one month after his December 5th surprise appearance at Bagram Airforce base in Afghanistan where he claimed excitement at hearing the playing of Manifest Destiny and nuts on stage with General David Patreus. Obama is quoted as saying on stage: 

To Chief Thomas Hager and to the commander and conductor. I gather we had a couple of other bands playing, Manifest Destiny and Nuts. I don't know about, you know -- I don't know how they sounded. What did you think? Were they pretty good? (Hooah!) (74)

 One day later, an ABC News' segment featuring General David Patreaus titled "Can We Win," Diane Sawyer declared 62 percent of Afghan residents supported U.S Troops and claimed that in 2006 78 percent of residents in Afghanistan supported the presence of U.S Troops. In the "Can We Win" Charade, Petraeus speaking with George Stephanopoulos declared that the Afghan Nation was inherently corrupt since its beginning. (75) A few short months later, photographs appeared in Rolling Stone of U.S soldiers dismembering Afghans they had killed and posing for pictures as Trophy kills. Afghan activist and former MP who was kicked out of the Afghan Parliament for criticizing NATO, Fundamentalists and Warlords, Malalai Joya wrote in the Gaurdian: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/mar/30/kill-team-photos-afghanistan-us

 I must report that Afghans do not believe this to be a story of a few rogue soldiers. We believe that the brutal actions of these "kill teams" reveal the aggression and racism which is part and parcel of the entire military occupation. While these photos are new, the murder of innocents is not. Such crimes have sparked many protests in Afghanistan and have sharply raised anti-American sentiment among ordinary Afghans. (76)

Joya was later denied Visa when she attempted to tour the U.S and speak in public with Noam Chomsky about the particular political education, which the people of Afghanistan have gathered over hundreds of years, particularly the past decades of her life. Joya often discusses the dual pronged attack, through War, on people in Afghanistan propagated in name of fighting manufactured enemies. She has really added to thoughts set in motion by many for some time questioning the Order inherent in "Wars" heaped upon peoples in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Congo, Haiti, Iraq etc. Funny that very few complained when the Obama administration denied Joya visa, yet a few years later everyone had forgotten all about the deed. (something was funny to me i need to tie that in***) Trump?

One can see parallels between the U.S "winning the west" or "How the west was won" and Afghanistan war propaganda, as well as 18th and 19th century colonialism. Real thematic and tactical parallels were witnessed by the fact that the U.S named the alleged killing of Osama Bin Laden a mere 2 months later, "Operation Geronimo." The Killing of Osama Bin Laden has spurred many questions regarding his ability to evade capture conduct terrorist operations for so long and then ultimately through death to evade trial.

Osama Bin Laden could not have evaded satellite technology used in the Monarch program that uses brain frequency to track everyone's movement. There is legitimate question over whether or not Osama even carried out the World Trade Center Attacks independent of government help. There is no way with the technology that the government possesses that Osam Bin Laden and the hijackers evaded security forces in the U.S to carry out those attacks. There are two main schools of thought regarding the September 11th attacks. LIHOP (that the government "let it happen on purpose" and MIHOP that the gov't "made it happen on purpose." I believe MIHOP. Once you acknowledge that the Monarch Program tech means that OBL's whereabouts and WTC Attack was known about then his May 1st alleged killing was planned for May 1st for political significance of the date. And once you see purpose and pattern of Monarch program assassinating activist whistleblowers or people with a common profile, Obama issued a sort of extra judicial pogrom call by staging killing on May 1st. This was followed by the rollout a few years later of Robert Caruso publicly condoning and calling to rekindle Operation Phoenix, an assassination campaign of suspected communists during the Vietnam war, which Monarch Program author Marshal Thomas believes was the predecessor of Monarch mind control targeting program. In fact, amidst then President Obama's presidency, it was revealed by the Investigative Journalist Wayne Madsen, that Obama's parents were involved with the CIA to identify and assassinate suspected communists in Indonesia. (76 A)

The measure of 30 years worth of atrocity heaped upon peoples of Iraq and Afghanistan, in which Osama Bin Laden, at age 22, was initiated as a consul, is inestimable. Aside from delivering the providential death blow on evil's iconic figure, held in a gift wrapped, fantastical recall of the 19th century demonization of the criminal, opium producing oriental and besides the millennial old representation of the enemy, personified as a growth, spawned from slivered satanic flesh, surreptitiously masked in evil's lair, the extrajudicial killing of Osama Bin Laden and "burial at sea" was a theatrical display of a hit on a witness to and suspect of 30 years of criminal activity. Following the President's May 1st call and the monsoon arousal at the displaying of the remnants of Operation Geronimo, in which crowds of young people, probably staged by the CIA for a photo op, Took to the streets, placard pumping CNN, chief operator in bringing about the Iraq war buildup, ran a segment in which Teach for America Head and Chief propagandist, Walter Isaacson, diagnosed Pakistan, a nation of 170 million people, with 'subnormality.' (77) This apparent killing and diagnoses of Pakistan came amidst the expansion of bombing across Africa and a NATO campaign that saw 20,000 airstrikes, or what's been called 'therapy,' carried out in Libya. The campaign was championed as success by the World Security Network, who derided the "endless diagnosis that replaces the 'therapy'" inherent in tens of thousands of NATO bombs and proxy warfare. (78)

 But once the euphoria of the Libya overthrow and assassination of Gadaffi, causing the laughter of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, passed, the powers that be seemed to allow, once again, for chaos to take hold in a country whose regime was replaced. Violence in Libya spiraled to the point of subjugating African migrants as slaves to be sold at auctions. (79). It seems that there is a prepackaged explanation for such happenings by the National Security State, that ill conceived regime changes result in unexpected chaos all as ‘miscalculation.’ Yet through all these ‘miscalculations’ money and power seem to accrue into less and less hands with masses still buttressed between polarities.

This brings us back to the Presidency of Donald Trump who came to power chastising the regime change wars in the middle east while engaging in unpopular racist and unsophisticated rhetoric making him despised around the World much like a heel in a professional wrestling company.

I guess Trump knew about the twin towers before it happened and wrote it in a book he published called The America We Deserve. (80) Its important to note that there is a long trail of published material and media which predicted the events of that day. Vice Magazine, for instance, knew exact details half a decade earlier and left a paper trail revealing preprogrammed widespread knowledge. This deliberate paper trail seems to be about revealing information to create disillusionment in the ostensible plans of 'Nation Building' and disillusionment in reversal of policies supporting dictators, meaning creating disillusionment in opposing dictators. I don't know how else to analyze deliberate revelation. It seems like an effort to provoke particular disillusionment or even redirect it.

 

The cartoon above appeared in a Vice Magazine article in 1994. In the article, the author asks the reader to "imagine the twin towers collapsing."(81) The fact that Vice magazine predicts Twin Towers collapsing after an Al Queda airplane attack in 1994, reveals that the government wanted the citizenry to comprehend, at a certain point, the 'truth' about the event or the lies about the event. There was a desire to reveal government involvement as evidenced by the article's 'prophecy.' The 'prophecy' reveals knowledge nearly a decade in advance.

I believe 9/11 was conducted as an intelligence test. I'm not saying that this is a rightful test of intelligence, but that it is in the minds of the architects. I see it as stupid myself, but I think the abusers see it differently. With regards to terrorism and domestic abuse, it appears to me that the official story of the Twin Towers is a deliberate fabrication with clues left behind as an intelligence test. Speculation on my part, is that this is to erode trust in institutions whether they be religious or national. A physicist and engineer, apparently, can quickly detect the false explanation being promoted. Perhaps this is a test in reason. The more you know about technology and the nature of the world the less the official scenario appears credible. Some of the Occult societies are allegedly based in an affinity for reason over superstition and faith. I think that's how they see it.

If you recognize terrorist attacks as false flags and the 'solutions' offered by the government is to restrict freedom, then the reason for the attacks is probably a disdain for freedom. Of course, there could be an attempt to create a discourse discussing this, in which they take rights away, so you don't ask for more than what you had lost. Freedom for most in America is the opportunity to work at a job that disrespects you, underpays you in order that you may pay to live in a house you are either in debt for or renting at extraordinary cost. On top of this is the system I described in the 1st 5 chapters of this book utilizing brain control Artificial Intelligence, mind reading, gangstalking and Directed Energy Weapons assaults. We call this freedom.

An original purpose of a calendar was for the reckoning of debts. Reckon is a computation. Additionally, you could say, as well, that calendars are to signify dates of social importance. On such a planet as this, dates of social importance can be markers of power as power is of utmost social importance. Humans base constructions of all kinds, whether they be material or something like systems of organization, often times, on existing forms or base them on forms of or what garners significance in their brain. One can look to the 2011 presentation of a newly sanctified killing arena in Libya occurring amidst 8 year anniversary of shock and awe for examples of what could easily be construed as a commemoration.

 Current state of the country:

 It is somewhat a hopeless situation in which we live in a totally new age fascist society in which the left and right uses the mob, corporations and the state to cudgel people. It is a tyrannical government assassinating its own citizens and engaging in state sponsored trafficking with people responsible like Jeff Epstein being murdered while in state custody or faking their death. People are being thrown in jail for being sick when they are lucky enough to receive care and not die because of the lack of care and then become indebted because of it. People are being thrown in jail for being in debt after trying to become educated. We are in never ending anti-terror wars which devolve into out right genocidal campaigns like in Yemen. 500,000 people are homeless.

America is a big cult. Unfettered Capitalism is a big cult. We are always trying to produce for profits, be productive all the time and 1/5 get weeded out from society. What we need to produce is housing, food, clothing, medicine, transportation, waste cleaning and education. Everything else like art for instance and entertainment should probably come from inspirational bursts. But everyone is forced to produce for profit for survival and rearrange their life to fit production. We quite literally are becoming machines.

 Chapter Break