Chapter 4 Rough Draft

  Chapter 4 

 The Technology Schizophrenics Have Talked About for Over A Century


In the book At Hell's Gate, an autobiography of a man who was a soldier in Vietnam and is now a monk, the author, Claude Anshin Thomas, describes an incident in his training when he didn't put his rifle where it was supposed to go and the sergeant who was over half a foot taller than him stood chest to his face and urinated on him. He then prevented Claude Anshin Thomas from washing for multiple days. This institution operates in secret with enormous technological advancement and openly describes weapons to produce voices in people's heads as well as mind machine interface technology. People will read stories of despots all over the world and of corrupt societies and have no problem believing the atrocities, but if you say the U.S Government and members of U.S society targets their own people, they can't believe it. 

There's a scene in the opening pages of a Star Wars book I read in which a character is having a conversation and says "the empire better watch out" and then, in the following chapter, it explains how at the newest building on the planet Gorse, a corporation is running surveillance for the Empire and this corporation immediately analyzes the phrase and the speaker. A commander of a surveillance corporation pulls up a file on a guy and he is red stamped and they monitor his speech and send him to the mental health unit. This is a Disney and Lucas Films book. There's a thing in our society of letting secrets out in science fiction, which I will touch a little more upon later. If you read science fiction you get informed. The real truth on earth is that this happens with thoughts and there is a massive deployable citizen paramilitary that engages in psychological warfare and other hard attacks against " thought criminals." There are countless articles that are deliberate disinformation in that they obfuscate that brain decoders eavesdropping on your thoughts have been achievable for a long time. This is being slowly revealed to make it seem like the technology and thus programs utilizing it are in their infancy when they are not.

Upon visiting Disneyland with my family, we went on the Star Wars ride Rise of the Resistance, my sister remarked that it seemed like fascism was being normalized with this ride. I could see her point. There's a normalization of fascism and introduction of corporate rule and authoritarianism happening in our society, it's almost mundane when you point it out. I actually found the ride Rise of the Resistance at Disneyland to be more of a "Hey! here it is: fascism, so prevalent that we made a ride in which you are hit over the head with it at an amusement park." 

 

However, we aren't always hit over the head with the machinations of fascism. Sometimes it still conceals itself. For instance, there is an entire information stream designed in which major governmental organizations, NGOs and Press Agencies all acknowledge archaic ways of spying. This archaic system is conducted to obfuscate the new high tech weaponry and surveillance equipment that Ted Gunderson alluded to in his testimony in the Keith Labella lawsuit presented in Chapter 1. As Targeted Individual and journalist Ramola D writes:

 

"As long as mainstream media and "lawmakers" who don't read bills but are comfortably ensconced in Congress focus purely on online communications and email/social media as targets of NSA spying, expect to be fed a continuous platter of lies. The real spying, real surveillance, and real electronic assault on Americans is far, far worse--all this is a cover for the radiation surveillance and neuro surveillance the NSA is engaged in:.

 (36)

In a Roots Action interview with NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake, the question was asked of Drake, “Is most deception from agencies like the NSA and CIA accomplished by telling the public things that aren't true? Or by not telling the public things that are true?” Drake answered that “It is a mix of both. NSA and CIA are often at odds with each other -- even rivals at times in certain areas -- but hide much of what they do behind the blanket of secrecy and national security. Deception is a form of hiding the truth, while projecting a reality you want others to believe." (37)

  In the book Pentagon's Brain by Annie Jacobsen, the author discusses Allen Macy Dulles, son of former CIA director Allen Welsh Dulles. Allen Macy Dulles suffered a traumatic brain injury during the Korean War and can only remember technology previous to 1952. This is basically how people treat schizophrenia. They ignore technological developments in the public domain over the past 100 years that would explain what Schizophrenics describe happening to them. In the Chapter titled Brain Wars, which is where Jacobsen interviews Allen Macy Dulles, she also discusses how DARPA, ostensibly, is trying to find ways to deal with Mental Illness and traumatic brain injuries for soldiers, but that, typically, DARPA has other non stated objectives when they develop various technologies. I thought it was kind of a non stated implication or nudge for Jacobsen to include her description of Dulles as not remembering anything beyond 1952 technology while discussing Mental illness in adjacent commentary in the chapter. Kind of like she was laying out the method or modus operandi for the system or psychiatry and society at large.

 For decades media has been promulgated to show people in skull caps or invasive surgery used to link their minds cybernetically to machines. In Februrary of 2023, CNBC ran an article discussing how Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos were funding a startup company called Synchron to the tune of 75 million dollars. Synchron, the article goes on to tell, will use a noninvasive method to read people's minds for brain computer interface or mind control computing that includes implanting them through blood vessels. In this case, the article actually says that the method to implant people draws upon "decades of existing endovascular techniques." However, lost in the article is that there are people who have claimed that methods to read their mind have been enacted for decades as part of nonconsensual human experimentation. Many of these people believe they were implanted with technology such as nanodust while others believe that there is technology to bypass implants. 

In his book Sapiens, Yuval Noah Harari writes of the use of science to create brain scanners at airports in order to read peoples minds:

"But science is not just about offensive weapons. It plays a major role in our defenses as well. Today many Americans believe that the solution to terrorism is technological rather than political. Just give millions more to the nanotechnology industry, they believe and the United States could send bionic spy-flies into every afghan cave, Yemenite redoubt and North African encampment. Once that's done, Osama Bin Laden's heirs will not be able to make a cup of coffee without a CIA spy-fly passing this vital information back to headquarters in Langley. Allocate millions more to brain research, and every airport could be equipped with ultra-sophisticated FMRI scanners that could immediately recognize angry or hateful thoughts in people's brains. Will it work? Who knows, Is it wise to develop bionic flies and thought reading scanners Not necessarily. Be that as it may, as you read these lines the US Department of Defense is transferring millions of dollars to nanotechnology and brain laboratories on work for these and other such ideas."

Part of the projecting a reality the agencies like the CIA and NSA want others to believe, as Thomas Drake stated in his interview with Roots Action, includes portraying scientific breakthroughs and their implementation in society as "Science Fiction." They do this by putting these ideas, concepts and technologies in fictional movies and other mediums or artforms. As I've already mentioned some well known movies like Starwars or Marvel movies, I point to yet another movie a few years ago, when Scarlet Johanson starred in a movie about terrorists hacking into people's minds and controlling them. It was called Ghost in the Shell. The movie mirrors reality. Children's shows also touch on this technology and system of social control. I watched the children's show Doc Mcstuffins and in one episode all the toys were spying on a child playing with his toys, watching on a big monitor, then they go to the child's room and infiltrate their playtime. In yet another TV show called Burn Notice, there is a plot which is about the Intelligence Community and featured a script in 2011 about FISA abuse, in which people were placed in brain research experiments after having their rights compromised by FISA. This is the literal explanation many people espouse is what happens to Targeted Individuals.

  In addition, perhaps to this science fiction being used for entertainment or strictly to hide the technological implementation in society, I think that people utilize fiction genres to divulge classified secrets so they aren’t prosecuted for giving away secrets. If I'm not mistaken, the comic Captain America started back nearly a century ago in a time when the Dupont Company CEO was giving public speeches about super soldier chemical enhancement. In this case, there's some public acknowledgement of a technology, but I believe that DC, Marvel, Starwars, Lord of the Rings (with the elves mind invasions) and more like the movie Avatar, as small examples, are examples of divulging classified secrets in a medium where people are protected. I think that its ok'd because it functions as a way to communicate to different audiences, to those in the know it is like a wink, for those ignorant it is a way to keep them believing it is fictional. It could also function as a way to inform people in the know or for the other audiences muddy the waters.

In addition to fictional movies hiding scientific breakthrough implementation, there is also implementation that is overt or breakthroughs which get covered in the media. One breakthrough implemented in society occurred in 2007 when there were ads in New York City that sent voices into people's heads as they walked by on the street. (38) The technology used in these advertisements indicate that the voices Targeted Individuals describe receiving are external & part of a weapon system. This weapon was described as such on the U.S Army website a decade ago and can be viewed via a screenshot. 



Witnessing dreams that are cartoons or have music and photos in them are also indication of brain invasive tech being weaponized, but people ignore evidence. How does one explain a person like myself or my brain producing dreams with professional cartoons or music from classical to rock when I have no drawing ability or musical ability. This technology was documented on CNN in the 1980s. In a series of Special Reports on CNN in 1985 the network discussed the “woodpecker” machine in the Soviet Union and talked to a Dr. Bob Beck who stated that humans are incredibly sensitive to electromagnetic weapons. In the segment the reporter describes images being sent to the brain or eyes of the subject of the electromagnetic stimulation. The report also discussed that the Navy was working on radio frequency and research into mind control. (39)

 

Even though the CNN report from 1985 was shared nearly 40 years ago on  a major network, it is not common knowledge or talked about like common knowledge that weapons to produce voices in the heads of targeted persons are in usage. Maybe in 10-20 years this will be common knowledge: There are Artificial Intelligence chatterbots (aka chatter boxes) linked up to an advanced neurophone satellite system that collects brain signatures for a mass database. This AI neurophone system can lock onto a target delivering voiced messages 24 hrs a day in an attempt to drive the target insane. There is a group of scientists reporting abuse called the Mind Hacking Strategy Group. One of these scientists is a Department of Defense and CIA whistleblower named Dr. Robert Duncan. He has written 3 books on the subject.

The U.S Army has acknowledged weapons, that are used in the targeted individual program, exist on multiple occasions. (on their website they identified v2k as an acronym for voice to skull weapons that beam voices into the heads of the targeted person.(40) Another time, in December of 2017, A U.S Army Initiative, a blog called The Mad Scientist Labratory, submitted an entry titled Battle of the Brain. In it they described neuroweapons that

 

grant adversaries (and perhaps the [U.S.]) the ability to kill, disrupt, degrade, damage, and even “hack” human brains to influence populations, bring about confusion &; panic, and disrupt [...] govt and society" (41)

 

 Former DARPA Senior Scientist, Dr. Paul Batcho's letter to federal agencies...

Questions of whether or not adversaries of the U.S Military are using the technology to "hack human brains" as described by the U.S Military ignore whether or not the United States uses the technology or weapon and, if so, what infrastructure is used to deploy the technology? The Late Former DARPA Chief Scientist with high level security clearance, Dr. Paul Batcho, stated Cell Towers are used for synthetic telepathy to attack Targeted Individuals. He wrote the following letter:

"I am a former scientist from Los Alamos National Lab in NM where I held a Q-Clearance for the DOE (top-secret DoD) for several years. I have also worked on DARPA research projects. I have a Ph.D. from Princeton and now live in St Petersburg and work… (Personal information deleted)…

I seem to have stumbled across an advanced technology that I would classify as synthetic telepathy. It clearly uses the cellular towers to transmit illegal signals. It sounds unbelievable but it is actual technology being used on civilians of the US.

My basic research does indicate that such technology can exist and dates back to the V2K (P300) mind wave technology of the 1970s. This does appear to be a much more advanced version that allows open communication of human mind to mind bridges.

Please forward my email to the appropriate DoD security office and I would like the issue investigated. Human brains appear to transmit and receive at the RF bands around 450MHz and microwave transmissions can be highly damaging in turns of induced bio-effects. Please also forward my email to any CIA or US technology team that may be researching similar technologies. It is very clear to me that such technologies exist.

Please feel free to contact me, and I will be able to offer some background and technical information."

Thank you

Paul F Batcho, Ph.D.

St Petersburg, FL 33701 (42).

In recent years, Congress has responded to instances of what is called Havana Syndrome with investigations on whether or not the brain damage experienced by numerous government personnel and diplomats were caused by weapons. However, this is not the first instance of members of congress responding or publicly acknowledging deployment of weapons to cause severe illness or damage, as is reported by experts regarding Havana Syndrome. As I mentioned earlier in this book in discussing voting, then congressman, Dennis Kucinich sponsored a bill in Congress in 2001 that identified space-based weaponry in order to outlaw it. This act was killed in 2001, but the case in Cuba with diplomats claiming they were attacked by a sonic weapon of some kind and CNN asserting that it could be a space-based weapon offers some insight into what was being described in these pages. "Psychotronic," "Electromagnetic," and "Sonic" weapons were all mentioned in the Space Preservation Act of 2001.


Movement in the U.S  to try to pass laws addressing these "Psychotronic" Electromagnetic" and "Sonic" weapons was preceded by the 1999 European Parliament sessions which called for international ban on human manipulation, there were demonstrations of crude devices, which could transmit sound electronically to the brain, bypassing the ear and sound waves. In 1999 the STOA (Scientific and Technological Options Assessment), part of the Directorate General for Research of the European Parliament published a report on Crowd Control Technologies. In the report, it discusses radio frequency weapons that manipulate human beings. It states:


 

”This report evaluates the second generation of ‘non-lethal’ weapons which are emerging from national military and nuclear weapons laboratories in the United States as part of the Clinton Administration’s ‘non-lethal’ warfare doctrine now adopted in turn by NATO. These devices include weapons using… directed energy beam,…radio frequency, laser and acoustic mechanisms to incapacitate human targets” The report states that „the most controversial ‚non-lethal‘ crowd control … technology proposed by the U.S., are so called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behavior… the greatest concern is with systems which can directly interact with the human nervous system“ The report also states that „perhaps the most powerful developments remain shrouded in secrecy“(43)

 

There is little doubt that these programs using Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons are "shrouded in secrecy." But as time goes on the secrecy finds itself exposed in Newspapers, often times, discussing how government personnel have been affected. On December 5th 2017, The Washington Post ran a story about National Security Agency Counterintelligence Officer Mike Beck. Beck believes his Parkinson's disease was caused by Microwave Weapons. (44) In recent years, the news media ran stories far and wide about Havanna Syndrome and the Government has responded with investigations and committees receiving expert testimony that the syndrome is likely caused by a weapon. In August of 2022, Newsy ran a story in which Journalist Mark Zaid claimed that 10-12 FBI Agents coming forward in Miami and DC claiming they were experiencing Havanna Syndrome are the tip of iceberg for domestic incidents of what National Academy of Sciences says is likely electromagnetic pulse weapon attack: (45) A few months earlier, CNN had a New York Times Journalist on one of their shows who stated that other diplomats and government personnel experiencing these attacks complained of voices in their head. (46) Yet, CNN didn't ask any follow-up questions of whether voice hearing in other instances, like with people diagnosed with Schizophrenia, is possibly externally induced as they declared with Havana Syndrome victims. This is a bit like learning that Jolyn West worked as a psychiatrist for the CIA and was part of MK Ultra, but not question the notion of conspiracy between CIA and Psychiatric diagnosis of Jack Ruby that I referenced earlier.

 

For over a century, people diagnosed with Schizophrenia have described hearing voices. The Washington Post excerpt below is probably one of the most significant pieces of evidence that the story of a genetic cause for voice hearing and 'schizophrenia' is a complete lie. The United States Air Force admits they have technological weaponry that transmits words and phrases into the heads of a person. The excerpt states that:

 

“an academic paper written by the Airforce in the mid 1990s mentions the idea of a weapon that would use sound waves to send words into a person’s head. “ the signal can be a ‘message from god’ that can warn the enemy of impending doom or encourage the enemy to surrender.” In 2002, the Airforce Research Laboratory patented precisely such a technology: using microwaves to send words into someone’s head. The patent was based on human experimentation in October of 1994 at the Air force lab where scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads of human subjects.”

(47)

I stated earlier in this book that there is an almost cultural production aspect to leaked information about Gangstalking or Targeted Individual program. The Airforce's revelation through academic paper is perhaps in line with this. Another Airforce pilot named John Robb, outlined the scope of a system designed to target people with gangstalking which Robb describes as "Open Source War":  

  At one point a bio for John Robb on the internet read as follows:

"John Robb is an Air Force Pilot and graduate of Yale who became a black ops mission commander, working with Delta Force and Seal Team Six. Later, he worked for the Forrester Group and served as a tech executive for software companies developing RSS and Blogging products. He was touted as "Best and Brightest" by Esquire and advised several intelligence and defense agencies on open source warfare." 

John Robb wrote a book titled Brave New War. In it, he explains the following: He describes a tactic called Open Source War in which a reader of the book describes that



"Every organization participating will be able to effectively silence critics and destroy enemies. Just as mission creep took the focus of fusion center from terror to all threats, disruption will be the solution of choice for any sticky situation. You won't hear about as many scandals or leaks but you will see an increase in people experiencing an inexplicable and unlikely series of hardships that destroy relationships, reputations and careers."

(48)



The following was also found on a blog about John Robb:


"Robb created a blog called Global Guerillas and by 2010 was posting some very unusual things. One post in particular suggests that groups should single out individuals for harassment. He suggests the whole operation could be framed as a "coercive game" where points are accumulated for acts of disruption or harassment. The rest I'll quote directly from his blog post...(link listed further down):
Robb's words..."


In short, learn everything about the target down to bank account numbers. This then enables the movement to target the individual and their family with: *Stalking and harassment. In the street, at a restaurant, or at school. *Identity theft. From financial to professional. Publication of private information. *Denial of communication. Flood phones, e-mail accounts, voice-mail, etc.
In short, any online group of sufficient size could launch an effort like this. However, to really zoom the effort and turn it into a coercive tool, one modification should be made. It should operate as an online game. Here's a potential template:
*Experience points for accumulating information. Pics snapped with a cell phone camera. Points for financial account information. Etc. Experience points translate into basic improvements in status which improves the weight of a contributor's vote (on the next target, the quests to open, etc.). *Quests. Equivalent to counting coup on a tribal enemy. Draining the target's bank account. Gaining control of a voicemail system. Tagging the target with paint. Disabling the target's car. Quest achievement translates into special recognition (emblems, new tools, positions of leadership, etc.). *Competition. Contests between individuals or groups to complete a given task within an alloted time period. As in first to....

 (49)

Whatever John Robb was describing takes place around the world. Gathering evidence for Security Services Stalking is very difficult. It is designed to not be noticed to the untrained eye. However, recently, more evidence of an online footprint presented itself. LIke Robb's musing, a German website published instructions on how to play a game called pay stalking:


In addition to these coercive type games, reminiscent of the tactics Targeted Individuals describe, is the ability to remote control people via electric stimulation of the brain or some sort of stimulation of the brain. The Department of Defense official science blog stated in a post that the technology to remote control the brain is powerful, or in other words active. The Blog states

"Every single aspect of human sensation, perception, emotion, and behavior is regulated by brain activity. Thus, having the ability to stimulate brain function is a powerful technology." :

 (50)

 Perhaps the technology to remote control the brain, which the Department of Defense implies is active, has been so since at least the 1980s. On the Targeted Justice Website is a quote from Dr. Eldon Byrd who ran the Marine Corps  Nonlethal Electromagnetic Weapons project from 1980 to 1983. Byrd was told that were his weapons to work they would be classified. According to Byrd they did work and went black. In 2001, Dr. Byrd stated the following: 

 

“Is Mind Control Possible? Absolutely. There is a mountain of evidence... Today we know there are technologies that can induce sound into the brain at a distance, can monitor and alter brainwaves at a distance, can alter behavior at a distance, can induce images into the brain at a distance, can target individual organs at a distance. Can disrupt the calcium ions binding on individual cell surfaces at a distance, creating pain and other effects anywhere in the body. Mind control technology exists, without a question.”

(51)

Today, these technologies used in classified weapons technology have begun to go commercial. On May 29th 2014, CNN ran an article about a bone conduction technology that produces voices in the heads of targets. The headline read “Bone conduction: Get used to the voices in your head.”. The article revealed that the technique to bypass ears and electronically send sound or visual images is real, but makes it seem like it's in infant stages. In this article, CNN referenced a commercial product called Shokz formerly known as Aftershokz headphones. (52) Even more recently and more technologically advanced than Shokz is Noveto's sound beaming tech, selling commercially, to beam sound into an individual's head without headphones. The Israeli Times announced the release of a desktop device which beams sound through ultrasonic waves tracking the ear of the listener. (53) What TIs and government whistleblowers tell is that the governments have a remote satellite system, which they utilize to communicate to people. Some people are selected out for harassment or hostile communication by it. I find the 'get used to it' headline by CNN to be hostile, but I am sharing that CNN admits the technology exists.

For decades the manipulative retort to anyone subject to covert uses of technology, like remote neural monitoring, mind reading and sounds in their head, of what is now increasingly released in commercial form, has been "how could anyone read your mind? what technique do they use?" And on November 24th, 2019, CBS and the University of Pittsburgh admitted Oh yeah, MRIs do that.  In A CBS article describing how, 60 Minutes showed that MRI machines can decode thoughts. Lesley Stahl writes, "Advances in neuroscience have shown that, on a physical level, our thoughts are actually a vast network of neurons firing all across our brains. So if that brain activity could be identified and analyzed, could our thoughts be decoded?" (54) Then later, Stahl describes that “Ten years ago, 60 Minutes met a team of scientists at Carnegie Mellon University who had begun to decode simple thoughts inside the brain. Now they've moved on to identifying complex thoughts from spirituality to suicide”

Since this revelation that MRI's can decode thoughts, a second retort to those subject to covert uses of technology like remote neural monitoring, mind reading and sounds in their head has also been that the process to read minds is messy and a slow process and can't be done in real time. Well in May of 2023 it was published in The Gaurdian that researchers at the University of Texas at Austin had, in fact, used Artificial Intelligence, similar to that used in Open AI's ChatGPT, which could in fact read people's minds in real time and turn it into continuous text.

The Article states that  "An AI-based decoder that can translate brain activity into a continuous stream of text has been developed, in a breakthrough that allows a person’s thoughts to be read non-invasively for the first time."

   AI makes non-invasive mind-reading possible by turning thoughts into text | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The Guardian

Dr. James Giordano has been giving lectures on the weaponization of this technology. In a lecture, titled The Brain is the Battlefield of The Future, Giordano describes how people in the military will undoubtedly come into an encounter with this technology during their life and career. Giordano states

“It’s not a question of if nonstate actors will use some form of neuroscientific techniques or technologies, but when, and which ones they’ll use.” (55)

MRIs have been around since the early 1970s, but the effort to read minds and controlling humans electronically has been cited to be an objective of Scientists informing the CIA as early as 1959. A quote from an Institute of Science in Society article states the following:

"In 1959, Saul B. Sells, a professor of social psychology at a minor US university submitted a proposal to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to build for them the most sophisticated electroencephalography machine that would have an integral computational capacity to analyze and, hopefully, make sense of the brain waves it recorded. In other words, the professor proposed to make a machine that could tell the CIA what a person was thinking, whether or not the person wished to disclose that information.

The CIA approved the project in 1960, adding some library research with five objectives. The fifth objective of the research was, “Techniques for Activating the Human Organism by Remote Electronic Means”. The entire assignment was thereafter known as MKULTRA subproject 119, MKULTRA being the CIA’s notorious mind control programme. It was based on the erroneous notion that the Soviets already possessed the means to control minds and the US had to catch up as rapidly as possible." (56)

In December of 2021, the United States government attempted to rewrite this history a bit by acting like China had entered new ground in developing and weaponizing "brain control weapons." The Biden Administration sanctioned 30 Chinese companies for helping China's military apply these brain control weapons. (57) There was no mention of MKUltra or the objective established by the United States in 1960 to develop the same ability. We are talking, at least, over 60 years of development in this area from the United States.


 In sanctioning these 30 Chinese companies for developing or dealing with Brain Control Weapon, The Biden Administration is giving  an acknowledgement by the highest office in America that brain control is a deployable technology. In Annie Jacobsen's book, The Pentagon's Brain, she discusses many different areas of merging of biology and machine. One term used by DARPA was Biohybrid. In the book she discusses a successful experiment in which a scientist at DARPA steered a lab rat using electric stimulation as part of an effort to create Biohybrids that can help in search and rescue missions as well as other applications. In Marvel's Black Widow movie, starring Scarlett Johanson, the content of the movie deals with Soviet Assassins and super soldiers through mind control and in one scene it touches upon Biohybrids when a pig is being remote controlled in the family home. Once again, this implementation of the technology, hidden in a comic book movie, touches upon an adversary's development of remote brain control. Annie Jacobsen's research demonstrates that DARPA was developing this technology in real life for the American Government. As a reminder, earlier in the book i mentioned how Regina Dugan, a former scientist for DARPA went to work at Facebook in effort to commercialize mind reading phones

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Duplicity and Manipulation: Culterica's Game of Parameters. some additions

Robert Naselund Brain Project Transcript from Scribed.. Copy and pastable.

"Crimes of obedience" and Fear of Ostracism.