Chapter 5 Rough Draft (or 6 if intro is chapter 1): Tactics and Possible Reasons For Their Use.
Chapter 5 Rough Draft: (or 6 if intro is chapter 1)
Tactics and Possible Reasons For Their Use.
The following is an excerpt from Battle For Your Brain by Nita A Farahany:
"Government surveillance of brain activity will inevitably push us toward greater conformity. With greater conformity comes a passive acceptance of authority and authoritarianism, either out of fear or in hopes of appearing cooperative, even when that conflicts with one's own moral compass. Children are particularly susceptible to pressure to conform and so are even likelier to try to redirect divergent thinking for fear of being ostracized. Many of the worst atrocities are "crimes of obedience"; acts carried out in response to orders from authority that violate legal and social norms."
I have searched for political organizations to involve myself with, but I quickly found out that TIs are being actively singled out to prevent them from fruitful involvement in political organizing. This fear of ostracism is a defining characteristic of American society due to the tactic of community mobbing and mind reading. Activist circles are no different. There is no acknowledgement of the greater practice attempting to control society. If you cannot talk openly and freely acknowledge the reality of thought control or brain control and psychological operations, I don't see how you can organize or humanly participate in political organizations. Society is more or less a phony, fascist place and social media is more or less a refuge from the govt control grid and thought control grid as poor as it is and still a place where the behavior still exists. I use twitter, I know that it provides a false sense of community and security. Very few people acknowledge or directly talk to you. I get great humor, insight and knowledge as well as platform for creative expression, but it takes time away from other endeavors. However, when all other endeavors are part of Big Brother, Twitter becomes a net benefit.
I thought surely people like anticivilization activist and Deep Green Resistance leader, Derrick Jensen, who discusses a culture of control, seemingly, as though he was in opposition, would be by now be acknowledging this system, but sadly not. There are some people involved , like Iran-Contra and Operation Phoenix investigator Bill Taylor, and all the whistlelowers at Bigger than Snowden, but for the most part, nobody finks on the program. They either believe in it, which is scary to think or they are all too afraid to. Perhaps this is because of the assassinations of targets and others.
Assassination Traps:
I was the target of one such assassination attempt in 2011. As I stated before, in September of 2009, I joined an Americorps program with a non-profit that builds houses in San Diego. I was recruited into the program by a co-worker at a previous job. Previous to joining the Americorps program in San Diego, as stated, I was very interested in the Guatemalan Genocide and Universal Jurisdiction. At my Americorps program, I ended up working on a project sponsored by Luis Palau, who had been closely associated with The Guatemalan Genocidal Dictator Efrain Rios Montt. In May or June of 2010, I began being stalked in public places by people and started receiving threats in seemingly random incongruous incidents throughout the rest of that year through 2010. In July of 2010, I was approached at a train station by a guy who indicated that he knew everything I was doing, who I was meeting, where I was going etc. He, subsequently, stated that someone should assassinate Arnold Schwarzenegger and Barak Obama. I figured he was some sort of law enforcement. I contemplated contacting the Secret Service. I texted a message to a family member and was persuaded not to contact the Secret Service. I figured that since they spy on everyone, that they read my text in the event that the guy wasn't law enforcement. A few months later, someone tried to assassinate me. In August of 2010, I spoke with a journalist named Katherine Hughes about an incident which occurred during my Americorps program. I divulged that the non-profit house building organization I worked for in San Diego had discriminated against a Muslim family.
I engaged in protests throughout 2010 and 2011. In April of 2011, I engaged in a protest against the Libyan bombings sponsored by the group ANSWER. A few days later, in April of 2011, I was threatened by two women who identified themselves as police officers. I was at a Starbucks in San Fernando reading a book called Unveiling Traditions by Author Anour Majid and they sat down next to me and engaged in directed conversation. They began talking to harass me and threatened that they "fuck people up" when they arrest them and that they "fuck people up when they least suspect it." They kept talking about people "crossing the line." They sat next to me for a few hours. A few days later, I was attacked on the highway in what appeared to be a staged car accident. A woman in a car next to me pulled alongside of me and maintained identical speed with me for 5-10 seconds and then swerved into my lane spinning out of control.
For the next 8 years, I refrained from driving and had cars synchronize going past my house at my exact exit. By September of 2011 I went to San Francisco and on the way home was recipient of another staged car accident and threat on the highway. In October of 2011, I participated in Occupy Los Angeles for 40 days or so. During one of the days' staged protest at Bank of America, I witnessed a plainclothed 'protester' signal with his hand while standing next to me. He signaled to the police officer on the gun to target me in their final assault on the protesters that were encircled there. The police officer began making eye contact with me and making intimidating faces indicating he was going to target me. Just a few weeks earlier, a veteran had been shot in the head with a rubber bullet and it fractured his skull. I left Occupy Los Angeles and while on the train I was approached through directed conversation by a woman. She said I should 'work with the police.' I went to the LAPD seeking investigation into the protest incident and never heard back. It was at this point that the v2k attacks began, as well as directed energy and gangstalking intensified. This was in January of 2012 and has continued til today. I could go into the gangstalking tactics and voice to skull and directed energy but it is rather long and maybe it will be detailed.
Allen Dulles who was Director of the CIA during the Cold War was involved in financing Nazis in the lead up to World War II and their rise to power in Germany. If, as I believe, that where there's financing, there's organization, it's important to note that Assassinations were used as a method to obtain power in Germany. Of course, Dulles used this method around the world. There have been organized hits on our own government and citizens and the prevalence of Nazi financiers at the helm of state caused people to suggest fascist organizing as being behind these hits.
Directed Conversation:
I have previously mentioned Directed Conversation that was used to threaten me by police officers previous to an assassination attempt, as well as used by police officers trying to get me to "work with the police," after spotting plainclothed occupy protestors communicate covertly with police officers. I'm not sure where I found this definition of directed conversation. I can no longer locate it. I found it online but I thought it was a good definition:
Directed Conversation “Has been defined as referring to a stalking tactic using stranger’s conversation to both intimidate and convey to the victim that they are under surveillance. During Directed Conversations, two or more stalkers will approach near to the target and engage in “normal” conversation with one another. The conversation is purposely made at a level so that the victim can adequately hear what is being said. During Directed conversation, personal information concerning the victim is inserted into the speech and emphasized by the stalkers in a fashion that most non-victims would not be able to discern as harassment. The purpose of Directed Conversation is to harass a victim as well as make the victim appear mentally unstable should they attempt to complain about the abuse.” (58)
I described torture tactics used on me earlier in the book. I will briefly remind the reader of some of them here.:
Neuroweapons:
But additionally, one of the things the security services have done to me is used what the military calls v2k or "voice to skull" technology. V2k is a term that describes a technology which beams voices into a target's head so that they hear voices in their head. For a long while, my voices were very abusive and would degrade me when I came into contact with women, for example, and pressure me not to eat during meals. At one point, the Monarch controllers told me via v2k that they were going to burn a hole through my heart and I receive chest pain near the heart or in the heart very frequently. There was a TI on twitter who aptly described this process of not knowing what is happening to your body and what is a real health concern versus what is being caused by remote weapon to mimic or make you think you have a health concern. They said that it was a form of torture to have your body mutilated and not know what was happening. I agree with this.
Sometimes you get the report on what is happening to you. Another thing that I believe the security services have done to me is cause me brain damage with zaps to the brain or electronic shocks to the brain, both as I'm sleeping causing paralyses and while awake. During one of my trips to the hospital, in this case it was mental health trip, I was tested and the doctor told me that I had brain damage. In fact, he told me that a section of my brain resembled that of an 80 year old man.
Sensitization
Mark M Rich, a Targeted Individual and author of New World War has probably the most understandable description of the way Targted Individuals are sensitized during their 'surveillance.' He has both a great website and book called New World War. The Website is titled www.newworldwar.org.
I will describe an example of the way the security services sensitized me to a specific form of their harassment. A number of years ago, the DARPA voices kept telling me to "polish yourself" referring to me as a thing to polish that they owned. Then they would synchronize people coming out of their house polishing their cars or wiping their windows with each section of the car designating a section of my body. At the time, I was very thin, but always felt overweight and was obsessing because my handlers were constantly harassing me. The day I wrote this paragraph, they had doppelgangers polishing or wiping the front of their cars to harass me because I felt positive about losing 15 lbs. So, they wanted to remind me of my previous mindset as well as to reinforce their ownership.
Health Policing and Environmental Control
This American spy network gangstalk me and harass me based on the efficiency of my diet and exercise. They 'reward' me when I'm 'good' and punish me when I'm 'bad by completely controlling my environment through media and community mobbing and giving me negative and positive stimuli. They do this with speech also. They are collecting all brain activity and thoughts, then analyzing how to implant artificial dreams to reward and punish for speech and behavior. Dreams are deeply related to our psychological health and harassment dreams architected by psych warriors can do damage when they want to. In recent years my dreams became more artistic and pleasant psychologically enhancing, but for a number of years it was in fact very detrimental to my mental health, so like i say i don't know if there was new leadership or something at some point.
While I write this book with an overarching message that these people are like a gestapo. Sometimes I feel like with regards to this aspect of the targeting like a more general overbearing health police. I would say that people can judge for themselves, but i can't actually reveal everything or make accusations about all the ways they control my health. Most of this book is about political surveillance, technology in society and psychological operations. And if you just take judgement out of it and political attributions then I could say that one thing I've experienced is an 'active surveillance' that seeks to moderate my diet exercise or drinking. It is like a bee hive influencing my health or choices. And I have to begrudgingly admit that the system has probably made me more health conscious and healthier at this moment in my life. But at some point, it was influencing me to deplete calories at an excessive level as well as caused me to sprint every day and hurt my knees. I still think that if I was left to my own devices, it is possible, I would have been healthy or healthier. I've been health conscious for a while. I think I would have avoided yoyo spikes by developing consistent habits that were more sustainable and be more confident and social without people trying to control me and likely wouldn't have the physical ailments I have with my knees.
Floating Box
There is a Targeted Individual who goes by the name Jonathan Triumphant on twitter. This is a quote from his page that I copied before writing this book:
TI’s are subjected to vehicular stalking daily. “The floating box” is one of the terms used to describe surrounding the targets vehicle and boxing them in. Often perps will try to scare targets and force them into accidents. This form of harassment endangers everyone’s lives.
Commercials Harassing Targets.
Targets report of personalized harassment via commercials. Upon writing this book I paused and realized that my ordeal began to take shape in an undoubted way in 2009. I was 10 years younger. I thought to myself that these bastards took the most prime years of my life. Subsequently to having this thought, I walked to the kitchen and an Amazon Prime truck zoomed by my house and on tv a commercial talking about bags under your eyes came on and stated "look ten years younger." This was followed by a switch to Fox News and a report that Jeff Bezos (the owner of Amazon) was working with Lockheed Martin to travel to the moon. Just a small snippet into 2 minutes of media feedback via commercial on tv and billboards on vehicles stalking you. Lockheed Martin of course is identified by many targets and whistle blowers as being responsible for carrying out the security services stalking.
Additional Possible reasons for targeting:
Ho Hum Humpty Dumpty VS Power's True Face. A Desire to destroy Civil Liberties
In Naomi Klein's Shock Doctrine, she spells out how government officials utilize disasters deliberately to achieve policy objectives with intention.
There has been much rhetoric during the Trump years about "the most corrupt President in history" and this rhetoric brushes aside serious corruption throughout our history and ongoing corruption that is bipartisan well beyond Trump. For example, Presidents have been selling out the people's civil liberties to corporations and authoritarian bureaucrats for over a century. Surrogates for these figures and the two main political parties try to paint this as accidental or like the Humpty Dumpty Trope. This accidental explanation of history I believe paints a false narrative of do gooder types in positions of power. And while I don't want to simplify things I think this is a very simplistic view.
Andrew Napolitano, a Fox News contributor, actually argues that Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt accidentally destroyed constitutional freedoms rather than deliberately. There are many angles a person could approach these presidents and find credence in the claim of subversion of constitutional freedom, as well as find other major faults in each, such as eugenics and ku klux Klan support. Napolitano is on the 'right' which might make the claim of accidental actions appear partial and thus more legitimate than a claim of deliberate actions. More recently and closer to the advent of Trump was during the Obama years, the term "gangster" was used as a term of endearment to describe the president after bombing Libya and killing the head of state, focusing people's attention on how inexpensive the invasion of Libya was. There should have been hearings on the use of depleted Uranium in Libya. Instead, we heard about Hillary Clinton's emails. This was all a misdirection. In addition to these obfuscations of Democratic criminality, there is the narrative sold that the Republican Party has become something foreign to it’s previous form. You could probably write a book titled, Crazy Things Republicans Said and Did Before Trump. For starters: Richard Baker, Republican Congressman from Baton Rouge, told a group of Lobbyists after Hurricane Katrina that "We finally cleaned up public housing in New Orleans. We couldn't do it, but God did." (59) This revelation of desire to literally decimate poor people of color's neighborhood through apparent natural disaster demonstrates a belief in malevolence against some, ordained by God, in order for a vision or benefit of others.
As another example of this tweaked thought process and, in this case, documented behavior by people in positions of power, I submit former President Richard Nixon and the development of the Drug War. I don't believe that Nixon represents an aberration in gov't institutions. He crafted the drug war and laws with racist intent according to his own adviser's admission. Why are Fox and Democrats fighting over Critical Race Theory when this mountain just gets ignored? Journalist Dan Baum revealed that John Ehrlichman, a central advisor in the Nixon Whitehouse, stated that The Drug War was designed to go after black people and antiwar people to disrupt their community building and political strength. (59B) This racist and political motive is likely just a revelation of how government institutions function throughout history behind the scenes. Nixon is not an aberration in my mind, but a revelation of power's true face.
Generational targeting
With these recent public acknowledgements of criminal and immoral oppressive intent behind leaders of the government, the question of why rather than if, these criminals select specific targets and devote time, energy and resources to harassing and mutilating them or just controlling their minds enters into discussion and is often asked.
One reason often given for being selected as a target is the assertion that the Monarch or MK Ultra program was based on transgenerational warfare. Many people believe rightly or wrongly that they are subject to bloodlines that are targeted by some powerful elites. I don’t know what to think about this. It could be that the issue is complex regarding this issue. It could be that you are in some sort of monitoring program which can be catalyzed by blood or ancestry and then when you do something in your life that challenges the group in charge of the program they have reason and a system to clamp down and engage with you. In my case, I’ve pondered that something could be afoot with regards to this. Afterall, monarchies, religious and other political organizations have fought transgenerationally for millennia. I have found some common thread with one Targeted Individual who said that her mother worked for Hughes Aircraft, a company started by the famous Howard Hughes. Howard Hughes actually heard voices and was diagnosed with Schizophrenia. My grandpa worked at Hughes as well. Hughes was eventually bought out by Lockheed Martin, a company that has been identified by whistle blowers as running the gangstalking program through gov’t contracts and they do it through Fusion Centers. Additional family history, which I pondered may be relevant to a possible transgenerational warfare aspect, is that according to a cousin, I am related to a friend or associate of anarchist Michail Bachunin, Saverio Friscia. In his writings, Bachunin discussed government experiments in the late 19th century.
Comments
Post a Comment