Chapter 7 Thoughts and Speech Which likely got me targeted Part 2

 Immigration:

Growing up I never understood the calls for assimilation into America. I always thought that something was missing as you lose connection to your roots. I am a 3rd generation American, at least I think I have that right. My grandpa immigrated to America at age 18 from Sicily and my grandma was daughter of Italian immigrants. She was born in New York. On my Scottish/ Irish side, my family came some time after the civil war. My Irish ancestors came over on a ship called the Ethiopia in 1877, in fact on April 11th, which is my birthday. I don't know all the dates by heart. Anyways, there was a lot of talk surrounding Immigration during the Trump Presidency and campaign for President. I am all for the 14th Amendment in which people born here are citizens. I think if America could overlook nazi war criminals and include them in U.S Intelligence structure that we could overlook illegal immigration and grant the undocumented citizenship when most of their "crimes" consist of scrubbing our floors or whatnot. However, I don't think that is enough to deal with the problems presented to us through the global system's fallibility. I think that political integration between nations can work to solve the problem of a hierarchy of nationalities throughout the world, and particularly in America. There are people who don't even enjoy the status of refugee or legalized immigrant status in America or in other countries also. This has the effect of creating a permanent underclass throughout the world where people don't have rights and can be exploited. Look for instance at non-citizens workers working the food supply in America. These people are basically making the economy go, but should we really rely on exploitation to run an economy. Should politicians be boasting about this as leaders of countries? These people should have all the benefits of citizenship and protections supplied with it. I don't understand why average working-class people in this country (America) aren't for raising the status of those in the underclass of America. By allowing people to be exploited we are actually demeaning our own standing in the economy and on the political front. Most importantly though is that it is just plain awful and wrong to run your economy on the backs of exploited people, just as slavery was.

It feels like there is an effort to create inflation so that people won't support ending the slave like status of farm workers or food production workers as an example. Throughout the 2022 election season, inflation ran high. The day after the 2022 election ended, there were headlines that ran saying that Inflation was "cooling." It was almost as if we had just been extorted by some organization controlling the economy. 

If there really is a latent benevolence to the Constitution, then we really need to heed the call to eliminate the underclass status of non-citizens. And this is just a start. Once you go down that road, the glaring evil of exploitation in the American empire presents itself. So I'd say people should not be in cages, which they shouldn't, but they should be moving freely and equally. I agree with Libertarians that borders should be open, but recognize that probably Libertarians are connected to monied interest or industrial interest that would like a surplus labor pool in the U.S, which is why im for international integrated citizenship rather than just work visas. I think that in global system where Corporation, American Military and rich people surpass boundaries and borders, that poor people and average people should have access to the wealth that was often extracted from their countries and resides in America.

I had a conversation in college that I vaguely remember with an anti illegal immigration proponent in which I stated that immigrants were basically invited into the country do to the fact that the walls just push people into the desert but let them in. The point I was making is that people shouldn't be penalized for doing what society wants them to do and should be given citizenship. I was responding to rhetoric which claimed people snuck into the country. This conversation is some basis for counter intelligence harassment and what Trump FBI conspiracy is based on. The anti illegal immigration proponent I had that conversation with later became a police officer and now I get misrepresented in media as Donald Trump , Steve King and Ralph Northam as a war on my identity, which is a human right violation.

The border is a reflection of the world and the crisis is poverty and global empire. It's not an "immigration problem" in U.S along southern border it is capitalism and empire problem. People's needs are not being met by the global economic and political system. For many, the land that was theirs is now under this domain in a system which always sought to exploit and subdue the rather than include equally. The media loves to point out when someone immigrates from Venezuela. While increased numbers of Venezuelans have immigrated since their economy has failed, in part because Venezuela isolated and the United States declared economic war on the country, accoding to The Migration Policy Institute, South America made up only 8 percent of all foreign born immigrants in the United States in 2022. So the overall numbers of immigrants over the years are related to a greater systemic problem in the global political and economic order.

There have been genocides committed against Central Americans more recently than the Jewish Holocaust, and now they are being imprisoned in camps. Yet, somehow this is "offensive" to call these concentration camps? What's crazy to me is all the propaganda attached to the immigration issue or debate. Lines like people are coming to America because "America is the most prosperous country in the history of the world" or people are coming to America because "America is a beacon for the world" or people are coming to America because "America is the greatest country in the history of the world." And obviously it is prosperous, has positive qualities and has qualities better than that which people are leaving, but it is a bit more complex why people are leaving and coming. And how do you determine the 'best country in the history of the world?' There's probably qualities in countries that people are leaving that are better than America and qualities that are worse.

Right wing appeal to sensational crimes committed by individuals to bolster anti immigrant policies like deportation is a bit like saying Loreena Bobbit chopped off that man's genitals so therefore we should get rid of all women in society. It is that idiotic and psychopathic.

America is a complex place and I think it's ok to admit to its complexities. So while it is nice to show pictures of the Statue of Liberty and talk about welcoming poor people into America while it offers opportunity, relative freedom (or used to attempt to) and hope to people, it feeds off of them as well. I think it is ok to also state that America has a history in which it likes to exploit immigrants, so each generation lives off the backs of new immigrants as they rise. The most common example is to describe how we eat food, which is largely picked by immigrants making small wages, keeping food prices down. That's the modern example. 

America functions off the backs of immigrants and we can never make large numbers of these immigrants citizens with access to proper education, housing or healthcare. Large swaths of Americans are fine accepting more immigrants and running the economy off their backs but can’t again make them citizens. Many seem to think this is acceptable. The whole system benefits from the fact that Democrats function as the good cop saying they want to solve immigration problems and create a "path to citizenship" and then Republicans play the game they've played for over 100 years and drum up racist fears making the political and social environment, as i said, hostile for immigrants. Meanwhile the rest of us 2nd 3rd 4th and so on generation immigrants receive privileges and luxuries off this setup. The whole thing is wrong.

Nicole Wallace was on TV in April 0f 2019 and stated that Bush was great for immigrants because he had compassion. Bush created ICE, but the Bush rehabilitation project otherwise known as the Trump Presidency is alive and well. There was a Congressional hearing on the border in April of 2019 and a general I think was the speaker and said that pushing people into the desert was used as a deterrent and was 'working.' Besides meaning that the border wall is stupid and fencing as well, there's numerous people who have argued for some time that this is a modern day middle passage. That we are weeding out the strong, who survive the desert and the weak who can't make the trip. I think that this is a correct comparison. The middle passage, if you don't know, is what we call the slave journey on slave ships, where the slave masters would perform this type of weeding out exercises in cruel ways.

To conclude my personal thoughts that may have received some attention from the Intelligence Agencies, the root of the "immigration problem" in America is violence, global poverty and modern as well as historical global empire. And some will probably argue that the current system is fine and that immigration in America, as is, makes America strong and they would be right, largely. There are some who see a system that weeds out bad apples from good apples and that periodic amnesty to cheap and willing laborers who then 'make a better life for themselves and their descendents' and only 'if they work hard' is fine. In fact, people often boast of their working class immigrant ancestors making the backbone of the American economy and cultural and social sphere. But this leads one, if they examine the 'problem,' to ask if it is right to continuously count on an exploited class of people to run the economy, who then live as second class citizens in America. As stated previously, the historical empires, particularly the American, Portuguese and Spanish are central to 'immigration' within the modern southern borders. And poverty within those borders inevitably adds to that central original fact. So I don't see how you can now divorce the people from each other by modern National Boundaries, in which wealth and wealthy travel across boundaries like the imperial predecessors and now do so as their modern counterparts, but the poor are expected to 'break the law' in order to travel and earn a living, thus making them second class citizens and not having voting rights etc in the societies they live in. So I think it is time to start exploring or asking questions about democratic integration of the former and current empires and their modern states.

Religion... origins

• Sometimes I think that the transhumanist or elite imperial humans are trying to make a new religion and are using us Targeted Individuals as sacrifices and religious figures in their religious cults. The possible being or life force that either demanded we call them God or we decided to call God can do good things and make beautiful things, but be simultaneously be a pscyhopath.

• If the Abrahamic-Judeo-Christian story is a myth based in some human historical truth and If there is a being who created the life on this Earth as it is, particularly humans, and then demanded we worship them and call them God, then they are probably a psychopath.

• Listening to Michael Tsarion's Brotherhood of Death in which he discusses hidden fraternities and hidden groups and he discusses excommunication, which is essentially the deprivation of the privileges offered by whatever group's membership. I'm an excommunicated cyber slave American. In druidic times, such sentence was only superseded by death. All this 'Targeted Individual' material and phenomena I believe is FBI to further harass people subject to excommunication, ritual abuse and Schizophrenia programs.

• I respect people with this view and I see that it can be comforting on some level, but for me I can't understand the whole "it is all part of God's plan." There is so much suffering in the world and I'm not talking about myself or anything and when someone says this, it makes me think " your God is a psychopath?" Then people start thinking I'm a Satanist, which I am in no way. I think I'm non-biblical. But I guess I'll add that I could see intelligent design and I am inclined to believe in intelligent design. And if this is all a simulation of some sort, then the designer has got to be a little nuts.

• Technology is becoming biblical. People can create natural disasters and artificially inseminate women. Blind people can see. Sick people get well etc. This leads some people to suspect biblical stories documented or were myths about advanced civilizations or time travel.

•  I read a book titled Caesar's Messiah, by Joe Atwill. It is a theory based on mathematical impossibilities and improbabilities that the gospels were written by the Flavian family during the Flavian Dynasty. And that Christianity is a giant religion created by Roman emperors to undermine messianic Judaism due to the revolution in Rome by the Sicarri, then have people worship the emperor as a god, informing posterity of the fact by elaborate parody maze. I find the theory to be very probable. And thought it was a good book. I also think that the Bible is likely a symbolic representation on a technique of rule or political technology. Control two worlds, heaven and hell or majestic world and underworld with all of your own people ("celestial beings") then have everybody align with either or and fight wars controlled by you and your aristocrats. I guess that I'll follow up that I think it is possible that there is a creator that wants to be called God and worshiped and that there is circumstantial evidence for this.

•  The God Code was a book by Greg Braden in which he proclaims that there is a code in our DNA which when transposed or decoded using Arabic and Hebrew and the periodic table of elements, reads "God Eternal in The Body." I have no real knowledge of Hebrew and the number coded used by Braden, so I don't have an educated background to know if the elaborate method for finding the code is possible with intent to find it or if there really is something to the lack of chance alleged to have the code read such a message. I lean towards there being something to it.

• I'm not religious, but I do think it is very possible and even likely that there is intelligent design in life. I personally speculate that there was at some point beings that wanted to be referred to as gods or god and that they wanted to be worshipped. I don't worship them. I think that they may have designed or created human life or dna very possibly though science or supernatural means. I also think that there could be a life force or being in the universe that parallels these gods or god wannabes and supersedes it rectifying the psychopathy or perhaps just foolish or fallible nature of earth's possible God or Gods. I also think that humans fashioned themselves as gods or god, perhaps in emulation. Something akin to secret societies like in Joseph Atwill's book about the Flavians in Caesar's Messiah.

• There was a global society that was the People of the serpent or something so all these stories from the bible and in other creation and ancient histories or mythologies all allude to the serpent. Some say that there was knowledge of frequency and serpent like energies in electromagnetics and life and biology so that there were people who understood this knowledge and were referenced as "serpent like" or "Reptillian" which is possible explanation for mythologies of reptilian humanoids. It's theorized by some that people who were referenced as reptilians serpent heads were metaphors for knowledge of the unseen energy shape of the universe and life.

 

Philosophy:

 

•  “Man is not made for the state; the state is made for man. To deprive man of freedom is to relegate him to the status of a thing, rather than elevate him to the status of a person. Man must never be treated as a means to the end of the state, but always as an end within himself.”

        --Martin Luther King Jr.

 

• I don't really like the propaganda which tells us all to become servants so that we can be exploited, but simultaneously I think one of my most useful days in life was a service project in Mexico helping put a roof on the on a house. I felt like it mattered what I was doing. Now, really, that roof was a bandaid on a huge injustice and economic disparity and so I'm not saying that it is some end all putting roofs unprofessionally on makeshift houses, but just working to help people made me feel good and like something got better for a small fraction. I'm hesitant to say its a 'favorite day' because you know it was somewhat exposing the limited resources we have to make a difference in current system, but the people were all great &hard working and caring and it was everybody pulling together. It was people from the local community there. The people whose house it was deserve so much more.

• I saw a few people bring up an apparent talking point that diminishes Alexandria Ocasio Cortez because a year before running for office she was a bartender and now she is a congressperson. Am I wrong to say that many of the revolutionary war figures or founding fathers were workers in taverns or were owners of Taverns? Also, another critique was that she allegedly changed her position on her website on war and peace and made it more of a silent statement on the issue, which I see as a potentially fair critique, but it had me thinking. For people that are anti war or non-violent(i am probably mostly like that) I ask what do you do in the face of a Nazi like regime that genocides people like Jews or invades other countries and kills innocent people? For people that are pro-military or pro-war for the sake of protecting human rights, I ask are you willing to kill innocent people to protect innocent people? And, of course, I ask these questions while not negating the question of motives and actions leading to the circumstances, which would provoke the questions and hypothetical or historical circumstances in the first place because there is more complexities like financing of thuggish political parties, banks etc.. I also would ask a now sitting congressperson: what about the fact that America is now itself a lawless state having pulled out of the Geneva Conventions, shouldn't that be considered when supporting the state's war making capabilities?

Conspiracy:

• "Is complaining about the secret services crazy? No. The people who do are simply the victims of a very large system that commits unlawful or criminal acts at least as often as large companies do. This is why victims are no more unusual than people who claim to have been defrauded by their telecommunication company or their insurance provider."

• The mass shootings are likely psychological operations. Everybody in the intelligence field knows about them.

• There is so much in the way of Psychological Operations coming at us that relevant information gets swallowed by new information and disinformation: One common troth of information is the info that is in the public domain about Operation Paperclip in which Nazi Scientists were brought into the United States and incorporated into the National Security state structure and given positions in organizations such as NASA. This often obscures that monied interests in America played a significant role in propping up the Nazi's as they rose to power and afterward.

• There are definitely true things about the targeting program like artificial dreams, digital twins & parallel simulated realities informing and influencing this one, but I speculate that someone discovered how to see and influence events through time even if that someone is AI.

 

Disinformation:

 

• For people who don't think its possible that Bob Marley was assassinated by the government for his music: Do you think that the government just stopped at the Kennedy family and that was it? Operation 40 was actually a project under Kennedy too. The reason I bring it up, is because Kyrie Irving was held out as crazy for saying the Earth is flat. There is a weird information stream on the internet claiming the earth is flat, but in the article I read, it simultaneously classified his belief that Bob Marley was assassinated as ‘crazy.’

 

• Dan Baum's reported interview with Erlichman should be all over the place. And he should be grilled on why he didn't reveal it for twenty years. There should be a drug war litmus test for the new Supreme Court Justice. Excerpt from Harpers Magazine Article by Dan Baum: Top Nixon Advisor John Ehrlichman on Nixon's war on drugs: “You want to know what this was really all about?” Ehrlichman asked with the bluntness of a man who, after public disgrace and a stretch in federal prison, had little left to protect. “The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.” 

  

Corona Virus

Due to my knowledge of Mind Control, Weather Control, Total Information Awareness, World Sentient Simulation, Full Spectrum Dominance, Biological Warfare being heralded by Neo Cons as "politically useful tool," I know that there is effort to control everything. Couple that with the practice of racketeering and you have a potential scam being played in Covid 19. Now add my personal experience being hit with covert weapons systems by govt taken to hospital which lied and turned me into a customer of big pharma and I am very skeptical about what Covid 19 is and what we are being told.

Former president of Bolivia, Evo Morales, has stated that he believes the Covid 19 virus is biological warfare, the intelligence agencies of the United States and the consensus here from corporate /state tv is that biological testing joint from U.S and China was responsible for an accident resulting in the Pandemic. Evo Morales' contention is erased from media who doesn't cover the thought of bio warfare even though top gov't officials in The Bush administration stated publicly that biological warfare would be a 'politically useful tool' in an "American Century." Simultaneous to this apparent coverup of biowarfare is the fact that DEW electronic war crimes are being openly discussed but only for U.S. Government personnel. This leads me to question what, if any, relation DEW has to Covid. I personally experienced symptoms of covid such as restricted breathing for five minutes at night when other weapons testing is typically done on me, producing bodily health effects. The body is electrical and can be manipulated externally as well as through nanotech linked electronically to external sources. I also remind the reader of the transcript of Robert Naelsund's lecture where he describes the allegation made by two british Scientists that the United States posessed a supercomputer controlled system that could control people's health and brain.

On a couple of occasions at night for five minutes I experienced symptoms such as restricted breathing and lung restriction and pressure. It quickly went away and fell in line with the usual heart and chest pain and other weapons testing I get at night as I fall asleep. Someone wanted me to know that they could induce symptoms stated to take place with Covid 19. Due to the significance of life and death, questioning government authorities or the official story during Covid 19 is met with very emotional responses. When You are a Targeted Individual you experience years of millions of people lying daily about the true nature of society and government. You are usually funneled into the mental health ward at your local hospital where the medical establishment participates in large scale fraud at every hospital covering up a system which dolls out life and death. Millions of people lie daily about something as serious as murder by the state and human rights abuses that include human trafficking, rape and weapons experiments that bring people to the brink of death and give them organ damage. So when Covid 19 rolled around I was not ready to trust government officials and the medical establishment reporting a deadly virus that required them to shut down, isolate and excuse overt massive surveillance. I know that they lie about serious issues every day and that millions are capable of perpetuating a big lie. However, I live with people who have underlying conditions and I am in only a position to respect what the authorities say as they do sometimes tell the truth. I know that corona virus has been around for 60 70 years or something and so I believe there are definitely people getting something called Covid 19 and dying. I just don't know how many are getting it and how many are dying were the numbers subject to lies, where does it begin and end? That I don't know. Where does high tech weapons testing come into play? That I don't know either.

I actually got Covid while writing this book but still have these thoughts about all of it. I tested and came out negative the first test, so I figured I just had a headache. Then tested the next day and had covid positive. So, I didn't quarantine first day after then negative test and two family members got covid as well. It makes me conclude that it’s inevitable that if I live with elderly people, I’m going to eventually go do something and bring back an illness to them which can be dangerous. Even though this time I was with most of them on the trip. So, I think this makes me conclude that I need to move out or have my own living quarters. I'm assuming i got it on the trip up the coast, but apparently Saugus where i live was a major hotspot in la county for Covid. I got symptoms about 2 days into the trip and supposedly it takes two to 3 days for symptoms to appear.

 I actually had this thought or fear before Covid 19 that some covert team would pass me an illness on a cart I used at Trader Joe’s and kill my family. So I think Dr. Fauci is likely evil.

Another aspect to the Corona Virus phenomena is that it is deliberately making people live like TIs since some keep 'social distance and don't socialize, travel, eat out or I am hesitant to because of harassment etc. This is not an endorsement of the tactic, but it is relevant to know that an organization that started all this has that in mind. People are basically slaves during stay at home lockdowns, they are working and can't go anywhere or do anything with their free time. They can exercise.

 More Miscellaneous thoughts:

• I shared an article in April of 2018 about the Owl as a symbol of a secret society and the following night an owl showed up hooting outside my window. #worldsentientsimulation

•  From Poland's defense minister investigating victims of electromagnetic weapons, to the Turkish government report on synthetic telepathy murder, to the Cuban Diplomats sonic attack, to the FBI CIA and NSA whistleblowers, to the Gangstalking recruitment videos at CSIS, to the Fusion Center 'accidental' release of mind control documents, to Facebook mind reading research, I've come to the conclusion that disclosure about counterterrorism mind control, synthetic telepathy, and remote neural monitoring is going to happen at an already decided timeline. I don't believe any action from myself will speed it along or slow it down. But I don't know if it will ever be full disclosure with a Church Committee or not or awards to victims. The payoff to victims from the 60s and 70s was very minimal. I know in my case that no court case could really repay or rectify the destruction of life.

• The gov't and corporations possess technology that can heat the ionosphere and intensify or steer weather. So the cause of climate change may be something other than just carbon emissions.

• I'm not one of these people who want to make Black Lives Matter say "all lives matter". I know that we live in a historical white power society with racist secret societies established in government and society writing laws and sitting as judges and acting as police forces killing black people at higher rates and policing black people to target black communities as a response to the civil war and civil rights movement. I know that dominant white society aided and abetted this process. However, I do have a problem when mainstream media erases police shootings of "white" people and acts like it doesn't happen at a high rate, even though it is lower than black and brown. They then present protests where "white" people protest police shootings as all altruistic do gooder empathetic white people. I'm sure that is a motivation, but white people also have bad experiences with police in our abusive police state. And presenting policing solely as a problem in which we have to deal with racism and once we deal with that things will be fine ignores that we have an abusive police state problem in which the police are abusing people.

• Many targets discuss how they are slandered amongst the intelligence agencies and then in society by fusion center operations designed to turn associates, friends and family away from the Targeted Individual, so that they will become isolated. I have no way of knowing if any of this happened in my case, but I do know that the Monarch Controllers in my case did try to paint me with certain characteristics to justify their abuse of me by security personnel and then would let me know they were doing so. At one point in my targeting it became clear that Monarch controllers were painting me as a racist who had to be stopped. It is unclear how serious of an accusation they were making. But they were policing me as if I was racist who wanted to stoke white supremacist groups. I believe that they were combatting political speech I made during the Libyan Bombings. I posted on social media during the Libyan Bombings, which resulted in intense gang-stalking harassment, that War Keeps Order for Cannibal System. I clearly had white general/officer on picture to indicate that white people are cannibals to remind that slave masters used to tell stories about themselves as cannibals to terrorize slaves, but they pass propaganda to characterize others that way as well. I was referencing the Rolling Stone article, which practically showcased a story of cutting up an Afghan casualty, chopping off his fingers etc., meanwhile the psyops managers sit back and also play to another audience and show radical Muslims as cannibals when they commit atrocities. Both sides keep committing atrocities, and then the other side sees the age old cannibal people that they have to civilize with their civilization or religion etc as with old propaganda. It is the same colonial system. And then I was alluding to a system which produces homeless veterans as well and to a system in which we profit off misery and eat eachother up in competitive economy with opposing interests for the public good and individual good. But this was utilized to provide feedback as if I was promoting white Supremacy, which is the opposite of what I was saying. It was also about myself as a writer etc and about surveillance, but it was interpretive. Finally, it was to make reference to the way propaganda has different meanings to different audiences by design. It was done to make commentary on violence perpetuated amongst opposing races of people. But I clearly made it acknowledging it was analyzing perspective of Americans as a Caucasian or European American.

• I also believe that some people selected me to be targeted because I was a white person sympathetic to racial issues, but critical as a subject of racial power employment by the state. It’s possible I became a good subject to experiment with to further an agenda either by displaying the contents of my brain or by obtaining contents of my brain in order to be able to appeal to those critical of racial power employment by state. My brain produced content that they could employ. Meanwhile they could work in such a way as to neutralize me. It is all very confusing to me, and I have not got a sure handle on it all as I am just a subject analyzing the feedback and effort to control me. That has been the one constant throughout this whole ordeal. The state wants to monitor and control what I say, think, do, eat and drink. They reward their approved commentary or speech and retaliate against disapproved commentary or speech with negative feedback. I don’t know that they see it as retaliation. They probably characterize it as some new system of communication or the “hive mind” as it's been characterized as. I have revealed some of my perspective in this book, such as that you can be subject to torture or other human rights abuses and that it violates one's freedom to be subject to this program, but it is not the dominating perspective in society. I think one reason people don’t talk about mind reading satellite, security service stalking, Directed Energy Weapons is that they view system of social control as superior to chaos and violence of the past. There is an embracing of the potential stability provided by controlling people's thoughts and lives.

• Sophisticated white supremacists at the top of society or white people at the top of society who created and benefitted from white supremacy project the most align with other races in hierarchy and weaponize the state to war on lower classes of whites and other races.

• -Warped beliefs or beliefs that lead to warped behavior by general society 1. abuse makes the person stronger 2. survival of the fittest 3. Privacy is old world 4. sacrifice for the greater good or God . 5. be a part of something bigger than yourself. 6. rule by mob majority rules

 Parting Thoughts: 

People competing and trying to outperform each other is a sickness in humanity aided by economic and political systems. I say this as someone who enjoyed sports much of my life and as a kid felt fair play of sport was refuge, ( I still enjoy sports and competition as a game) but it's more than just a pastime in scheme of nation building for people in charge. While its also a distraction which could be good and bad, Sports is used to mold the masses in respective Nations. It conditions you at a young age to compete with your peers, join groups competing with each other, coaches all say they are teaching you about life and conditions you to see life as a game while revering elite rich people and sorts obedient brainwashed into system which is based on individuals and groups atomized and separated, competing for approval by Oligarchs and elite societies and each other, all of whom judge who is worthy of quality life and subsistence and power. Oligarchs fund and control sports and athletes, who condition public to revere production machines and act as ambassadors for capitalism as multimillionaires. They also condition public to ridicule humans like production machines and brands etc.

What I like about the idea of capitalism is that you can conceivably have some choice or autonomy and a piece of property, but what I don’t like is that we all become production machines competing with each other for essential resources guided by accumulating wealth for rich people. Society takes work. There's some crossover appeal of successful hard work paying off into meritocracy as controllers of capital in society, but that's not necessarily descriptive of how system works, and it ignores people as human beings deserving of basic dignity. Also, people who produce a lot shouldn't necessarily dictate economy, which is an obvious problem. I personally would probably prefer it if we split everything like duties, resources and income equally in society, but not everybody is like me, so i don't want to make everybody do that. Also, duties would be difficult to parse out equally, but that's another issue. So, I'm for socialism as a medium between greed and equality. Something that ensures dignity and sustenance for everyone where we realize we are individuals but also responsible for the condition of humanity and earth and the life on it. I think we need to cement human rights like housing, food, clean water, medical care, living wage for disabled and living wage jobs for the abled as amendments to constitution. Why can't we be working 3-4 days a week 5-6 hours a day? We consume many unnecessary bad for you things because we are conditioned in survive mass produce mass consume system. Everyone who’s able could be employed and trained to share workload on necessary or worthwhile endeavors. Why do we require such big salaries or long hours to pay for necessities? Work should be for extra goods services. I think we need to make paycheck necessary for less necessities and guarantee food either have a Universal Basic Income or guarantee housing as a right lower rent and guarantee healthcare.

 Upon finishing this book I was reminded of the belief I have which I'm sure has been monitored and registered somewhere by a Supercomputer. I saw a lady chastise people who are socialists and she cited a professor who failed his class after they gave the average grade for all grades on tests. The professor was upset that the class thought socialism could work so he took individual grades away and gave collective grades and the class lost motivation. The lady used this example of how people stopped being motivated to learn was a reflection on the feasibility of socialism. 

 

But I believe that humans can be motivated by more than just starvation, deprivation and riches. You can develop a culture that functions highly outside this paradigm. Will it develop with a professor trying to prove it can't and undermining motives outside individual achievement amongst a lose group of college students? No.

 

Currently civilization runs off the motivation to not starve, be homeless or other deprivations and gives privileges through riches. I don't think that these are even the best motivating agents for human beings. Certainly not the best to build an entire civilization off of. To some extent the reason our system doesn't crumble now is because people actually, individually, are motivated by more and provide cultural value to our species because of other motivations. I think humans can develop to be motivated in other ways.

This leads to some of my thoughts on Money and business, which I believe are also monitored by various organizations. What should the role be of money and business ideally on earth? It would seem that a global economy is needed to pull all resources. But I don't think money can be king to the point of being the object at the pinnacle dictatorship of economy. Like We shouldn't have an economy in which market forces supersede the survival of life on earth and the greater ecosystems. It is useful to provide some unifying mode valuing labor and goods that everybody buys into. Businesses provide avenues for subsistence and creativity which people democratically vote for with their patronage. I think there should be some commonwealth which meets the basic needs of people and that this should be the general point of the economy. Everyone's well being and happiness should be the aim of our culture and politics within the bounds of earths living survival and sustainability. I also don't want to live in a world where Social Sciences or Arts, Liberal Arts or Humanities get replaced by economic factors like job plugging or universities geared solely toward getting students a job. Like there's more to civilization than that. Social or human development history and arts are all necessary.

I look forward to election day because I think that democracy is the best way forward to affect change in AMerica in the future. As stated previously, I think that Trump and Biden have totally tanked or tarnished the presidency and by virtue of destabilizing the highest democratic office have undermined democracy. Biden often says that he is trying to save democracy and campaigns on saving democracy. If you were powerful political organizations interested in saving democracy or the idea of it, I think the last person you’d have as your messenger is Joe Biden. This makes me think Joe Biden is a shill. I think that due to the two-party system, there aren't very many, if any, quality candidates to choose from. In fact, it seems like the powers that be are deliberately placing sorry to say but schmucky candidates for office or politicians in order to entice a revolt of some kind. But the question I have is to what end? Do they have some other non-democratic solution to the world's or the country's problems. Is this going to be an ugly controlling thing with the rule of violence? I'm a little weary of the culture in America having a revolution, as the only revolution occurred 250 years ago and protected slavery. There is the Chaos theory of the world, that the leaders like to create chaos and then amidst the chaos they can bring about order or thrive in chaos. As far as voting vs nonvoting goes, I don't think it makes much of a difference if I vote vs not voting. I'm not likely to bring along everybody in either scenario. I didn't vote in 2012. I didn't vote for president in 2016. I voted in 2020. I voted in 2022. I do think there is a difference in which party gets control, however there are overlapping oppressions that they doll out on respective populations almost like they are holding people hostage and trying to divide people.

So perhaps we can take these conflicts and find synthesis where we have it and acknowledge where our ideologies fail and can we create some political economic system that is new drawing on what has worked in the past with and what wasn't tried as humans, but without inward peace of mind and freedom how do we do this?

"To have inward solitude and space is very important because it implies freedom to be, to go, to function, to fly. After all, goodness can only flower in space just as virtue can flower only when there is freedom. We may have political freedom but inwardly we are not free and therefore there is no space. No virtue, no quality that is worthwhile, can function or grow without this vast space within oneself. And space and silence are necessary because it is only when the mind is alone, uninfluenced, untrained, not held by infinite varieties of experience, that it can come upon something totally new." Krishnamurti